Current status and technical challenges of CO2 storage in coal seams and enhanced coalbed methane recovery: an overview

被引:0
作者
Li X. [1 ]
Fang Z.-M. [1 ]
机构
[1] State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan
来源
International Journal of Coal Science & Technology | 2014年 / 1卷 / 1期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
CO[!sub]2[!/sub] storage in coal seams; ECBM; Gas mixture; Hydraulic fracture; Permeability;
D O I
10.1007/s40789-014-0002-9
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the past two decades, research on CO2 storage in coal seams and simultaneously enhanced coalbed methane recovery (ECBM) has attracted a lot of attention due to its win–win effect between greenhouse gas (CO2) emission reduction and coalbed methane recovery enhancement. This paper presents an overview on the current status of research on CO2-ECBM in the past two decades, which involves CO2 storage capacity evaluations, laboratory investigations, modelings and pilot tests. The current status shows that we have made great progress in the ECBM technology study, especially in the understanding of the ECBM mechanisms. However, there still have many technical challenges, such as the definition of unmineable coal seams for CO2 storage capacity evaluation and storage site characterization, methods for CO2 injectivity enhancement, etc. The low injectivity of coal seams and injectivity loss with CO2 injection are the major technique challenges of ECBM. We also search several ways to promote the advancement of ECBM technology in the present stage, such as integrating ECBM with hydraulic fracturing, using a gas mixture instead of pure CO2 for injection into coal seams and the application of ECBM to underground coal mines. © 2014, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 102
页数:9
相关论文
共 65 条
  • [41] Reeves S., The coal-seq project: key results from field, laboratory, and modeling studies, In: Proceedings of 7th conference on greenhouse gas control technologies (GHGT7), (2004)
  • [42] Reeves S., Oudinot A., A technical and economic sensitivity study of enhanced coalbed methane recovery and carbon sequestration in coal, DOE topical report, (2004)
  • [43] Romanov V., Soong Y., Long-term CO<sub>2</sub> sorption on upper freeport coal powder and lumps, Energy Fuels, 22, 2, pp. 1167-1169, (2008)
  • [44] Romanov V., Goodman A.L., Larsen J.W., Errors in CO<sub>2</sub> adsorption measurements caused by coal swelling, Energy Fuels, 20, 1, pp. 415-416, (2006)
  • [45] Modification of TOUGH2 for Enhanced Coal Bed Methane Simulations, SAND2003-0154, (2003)
  • [46] Seto C.J., Jessen K., Orr F.M., A four-component, two-phase flow model for CO<sub>2</sub> storage and enhanced coalbed methane recovery. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, San Antonio, 24–27 Sept, (2006)
  • [47] Shi J.Q., Durucan S., A model for changes in coalbed permeability during primary and enhanced methane recovery, SPE Reserv Eval Eng, 8, 4, pp. 291-300, (2005)
  • [48] Shi J.Q., Mazumder S., Wolf K.-H.A.A., Competitive methane desorption by supercritical CO<sub>2</sub> injection in coal, Transp Porous Media, 75, 1, pp. 35-54, (2008)
  • [49] Stevens S.H., Kuuskraa V.A., Gale J., Beecy D., CO2 injection and sequestration in depleted oil and gas fields and deep coal seams: worldwide potential and costs, Environ Geosci, 8, 3, pp. 200-209, (2001)
  • [50] Sun K.M., Fluid-solid coupling theory of exploiting coal methane and improving coal methane production by gas injection in low permeability reservoir and its application, (2004)