A Predictive Mathematical Modeling Approach for the Study of Doxorubicin Treatment in Triple Negative Breast Cancer

被引:0
作者
Matthew T. McKenna
Jared A. Weis
Stephanie L. Barnes
Darren R. Tyson
Michael I. Miga
Vito Quaranta
Thomas E. Yankeelov
机构
[1] Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science,Department of Biomedical Engineering
[2] Vanderbilt University,Department of Biomedical Engineering
[3] The University of Texas at Austin,Department of Cancer Biology
[4] Vanderbilt University School of Medicine,Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences
[5] Vanderbilt University School of Medicine,Department of Diagnostic Medicine, Dell Medical School
[6] The University of Texas at Austin,Institute for Computational and Engineering Sciences
[7] The University of Texas at Austin,Livestrong Cancer Institutes
[8] The University of Texas at Austin,undefined
来源
Scientific Reports | / 7卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Doxorubicin forms the basis of chemotherapy regimens for several malignancies, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Here, we present a coupled experimental/modeling approach to establish an in vitro pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model to describe how the concentration and duration of doxorubicin therapy shape subsequent cell population dynamics. This work features a series of longitudinal fluorescence microscopy experiments that characterize (1) doxorubicin uptake dynamics in a panel of TNBC cell lines, and (2) cell population response to doxorubicin over 30 days. We propose a treatment response model, fully parameterized with experimental imaging data, to describe doxorubicin uptake and predict subsequent population dynamics. We found that a three compartment model can describe doxorubicin pharmacokinetics, and pharmacokinetic parameters vary significantly among the cell lines investigated. The proposed model effectively captures population dynamics and translates well to a predictive framework. In a representative cell line (SUM-149PT) treated for 12 hours with doxorubicin, the mean percent errors of the best-fit and predicted models were 14% (±10%) and 16% (±12%), which are notable considering these statistics represent errors over 30 days following treatment. More generally, this work provides both a template for studies quantitatively investigating treatment response and a scalable approach toward predictions of tumor response in vivo.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 145 条
  • [1] Fisher B(1968)Surgical adjuvant chemotherapy in cancer of the breast: results of a decade of cooperative investigation Ann. Surg. 168 337-56
  • [2] Skipper HE(1971)Kinetics of mammary tumor cell growth and implications for therapy Cancer 28 1479-1499
  • [3] Hortobagyi GN(1999)High-dose chemotherapy for primary breast cancer: facts versus anecdotes J. Clin. Oncol. 17 25-9
  • [4] Stadtmauer EA(2000)Conventional-dose chemotherapy compared with high-dose chemotherapy plus autologous hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation for metastatic breast cancer. Philadelphia Bone Marrow Transplant Group N. Engl. J. Med. 342 1069-1076
  • [5] Norton L(1988)A Gompertzian model of human breast cancer growth Cancer Res 48 7067-7071
  • [6] Fornier M(2005)Dose-dense adjuvant chemotherapy for primary breast cancer Breast Cancer Res. 7 64-9
  • [7] Norton L(2015)Computational oncology — mathematical modelling of drug regimens for precision medicine Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 13 242-254
  • [8] Barbolosi D(2009)Adaptive therapy Cancer Res. 69 4894-4903
  • [9] Ciccolini J(2016)Exploiting evolutionary principles to prolong tumor control in preclinical models of breast cancer Sci. Transl. Med. 8 327ra24-950
  • [10] Lacarelle B(2014)Metronomic therapy and breast cancer: A systematic review Cancer Treatment Reviews 40 942-1047