Survivorship Care Plan Implementation in US Cancer Programs: a National Survey of Cancer Care Providers

被引:0
作者
Sarah A. Birken
Sarah Raskin
Yuqing Zhang
Gema Lane
Alexandra Zizzi
Mandi Pratt-Chapman
机构
[1] The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,Department of Health Policy and Management, Gillings School of Global Public Health
[2] Virginia Commonwealth University,L. Douglas Wilder School of Government and Public Affairs
[3] The George Washington University Cancer Center,Institute for Patient
来源
Journal of Cancer Education | 2019年 / 34卷
关键词
Survivorship care plans; Implementation; Cancer care delivery; Quality improvement;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Survivorship care plans (SCPs)—documents intended to improve care for cancer survivors who have completed active treatment—are required, yet implementation is poor. We sought to understand SCP implementation in cancer programs in the USA with the objective of identifying opportunities for improvement. We recruited cancer care providers in the USA via several cancer care networks to participate in a survey regarding SCP implementation. We used descriptive statistics to analyze the data. Three hundred ninety-five providers from diverse cancer programs in 47 states and Washington, DC responded to the survey. The timing of SCP implementation varied across and within cancer programs, with approximately 40% of respondents reporting developing SCPs more than 3 months after primary treatment or adjuvant therapy completion. Nurse navigators were responsible for 48–58% of each stage of SCP implementation. Processes that could have been automated often occurred in-person or via phone and vice versa. Respondents reported spending more than 2 h per SCP to complete all stages of implementation, of which less than a third was reimbursed by third-party payers. We identified several opportunities for improving SCP implementation, including broadening the base of responsibility, optimizing modes of communication, decreasing the time required and increasing the funding available, and limiting variation in SCP implementation across and within cancer programs. Future work should assess the influence of approaches to SCP implementation on desired outcomes.
引用
收藏
页码:614 / 622
页数:8
相关论文
共 146 条
[1]  
Ganz PA(2001)Late effects of cancer and its treatment Semin Oncol Nurse 17 241-248
[2]  
Robin U(2012)Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for colorectal cancer patients in Nova Scotia J Oncol Pract 8 246-252
[3]  
Folkes A(2010)Population-based longitudinal study of follow-up care for breast cancer survivors J Oncol Pract 6 174-181
[4]  
Porter G(2013)Use of imaging and biomarker tests for post-treatment care of early stage breast cancer survivors Cancer 119 4316-4326
[5]  
Grunfeld E(2016)Use of post-treatment imaging and biomarkers in early stake breast cancer survivors: inappropriate surveillance or necessary care? Cancer 122 908-916
[6]  
Hodgson DC(2009)Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care J Clin Oncol 27 2489-2495
[7]  
Elisabeth Del Guidice M(2005)Patient-centered care and breast cancer survivors’ satisfaction with information Patient Educ Couns 57 342-349
[8]  
Hahn EE(2012)Endometrial cancer survivors are unsatisfied with received information about diagnosis, treatment and follow-up: a study from the population-based PROFILES registry Patient Educ Couns 88 427-435
[9]  
Hays RD(2012)Cancer treatment and survivorship statistics, 2012 CA Cancer J Clin 62 220-241
[10]  
Kahn KL(2013)American Society of Clinical Oncology statement: achieving high-quality cancer survivorship care J Clin Oncol 31 631-640