Ground response analysis and liquefaction for Kalyani region, Kolkata

被引:0
作者
Sajjan Kumar
Pradeep Muley
Syed Nurussyidyn Madani
机构
[1] Madan Mohan Malaviya University of Technology,Department of Civil Engineering
[2] Maulana Azad National Urdu University,Civil Engineering Section
来源
Environmental Science and Pollution Research | 2023年 / 30卷
关键词
Liquefaction potential; Equivalent linear and nonlinear earthquake response; CSR; CRR; Factor of safety;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The main focus of this research is the ground response analysis and liquefaction potential analysis of AIIMS Kolkata based on SPT-N values at six different locations. The analyses are performed for the earthquake magnitude Mw = 7.0 and peak ground acceleration of 0.170 g. For this, Equivalent-linear Earthquake Response Analysis (EERA), Nonlinear Earthquake Response Analysis (NERA), and PLAXIS-2D software are utilized. In ground response analysis, various parameters such as shear stress, peak ground acceleration, relative displacement, and amplification ratio are evaluated. In liquefaction potential analysis, the factor of safety against liquefaction is calculated from different methods, such as the simplified method, EERA, and NERA, and their results have been compared. Further liquefaction potential index is also evaluated for the same earthquake magnitude and PGA using the factor of safety value evaluated from liquefaction potential analysis and ground response analysis for all the borehole locations. It is observed from the results that the equivalent linear analysis gives conservative results when compared with those obtained from the nonlinear analysis. Moreover, the simplified method too fails to predict the liquefaction susceptibility of certain regions that are found to be prone to liquefaction from the EERA and NERA analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:99127 / 99146
页数:19
相关论文
共 148 条
  • [1] Adampira M(2015)Comparison of equivalent linear and nonlinear methods in seismic analysis of liquefiable site response due to near-fault incident waves: a case study Arab J Geosci 8 3103-3118
  • [2] Alielahi H(2004)Ground motion zoning of Santiago de Cuba: an approach by SH waves Modelling 161 1041-1059
  • [3] Panji M(2000)Model for dynamic shear modulus and damping for granular soils J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 126 859-869
  • [4] Koohsari H(1987)Palaeobiology in understanding the change of sea level and coastline in Bengal basin during Holocene period Indian J Earth Sci 14 307-320
  • [5] Alvarez L(2015)Numerical analysis of earth embankment resting on liquefiable soil and remedial measures Int J Geomech 16 04015029-1782
  • [6] García J(1991)A general inversion scheme for source, site and propagation characteristics using multiply recorded sets of moderate-sized earthquakes Bull Seism Soc Am 81 1754-2082
  • [7] Vaccari F(2013)Variation is shear wave velocity and soil site class in Kolkata City using regression and sensitivity analysis Nat Hazard 69 2057-528
  • [8] Panza GF(2018)Influences of local soil conditions for ground response in Kolkata city during earthquakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., India Sect A Phys Sci 88 515-78
  • [9] González B(2014)Earthquake catalogue for estimating seismic hazard at greater Mumbai India Disaster Advances 7 69-1106
  • [10] Reyes C(2004)Realistic modeling of seismic wave ground motion in Beijing city Pure Appl Geophys 161 1093-1019