Venous Thromboembolism After Removal of Retrievable Inferior Vena Cava Filters

被引:0
作者
Takuji Yamagami
Osamu Tanaka
Rika Yoshimatsu
Hiroshi Miura
Tsunehiko Nishimura
机构
[1] Graduate School of Medical Science,Department of Radiology
[2] Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine,undefined
来源
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | 2010年 / 33卷
关键词
Pulmonary embolism; Thrombosis of extremities; Interventional procedures; Vena cava filters;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to examine the incidence of new or recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) after retrieval of inferior vena cava (IVC) filters and risk factors associated with such recurrence. Between March 2001 and September 2008, at our institution, implanted retrievable vena cava filters were retrieved in 76 patients. The incidence of new or recurrent VTE after retrieval was reviewed and numerous variables were analyzed to assess risk factors for redevelopment of VTE after filter retrieval. In 5 (6.6%) of the 76 patients, redevelopment or worsening of VTE was seen after retrieval of the filter. Three patients (4.0%) had recurrent deep venous thrombosis (DVT) in the lower extremities and 2 (2.6%) had development of pulmonary embolism, resulting in death. Although there was no significant difference in the incidence of new or recurrent VTE related to any risk factor investigated, a tendency for development of VTE after filter retrieval was higher in patients in whom DVT in the lower extremities had been so severe during filter implantation that interventional radiological therapies in addition to traditional anticoagulation therapies were required (40% in patients with recurrent VTE vs. 23% in those without VTE; p = 0.5866 according to Fisher’s exact probability test) and in patients in whom DVT remained at the time of filter retrieval (60% in patients with recurrent VTE vs. 37% in those without VTE; p = 0.3637). In conclusion, new or recurrent VTE was rare after retrieval of IVC filters but was most likely to occur in patients who had severe DVT during filter implantation and/or in patients with a DVT that remained at the time of filter retrieval. We must point out that the fatality rate from PE after filter removal was high (2.6%).
引用
收藏
页码:74 / 79
页数:5
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] Ferris E(1993)Percutaneous inferior vena cava filters: follow-up of seven designs in 320 patients Radiology 188 851-856
  • [2] McCowan TC(1998)A clinical trial of vena caval filters in the prevention of pulmonary embolism in patients with proximal deep-vein thrombosis N Engl J Med 338 409-415
  • [3] Carver DK(2002)Repeated Gunther Tulip inferior vena cava filter repositioning to prolong implantation time J Vasc Interv Radiol 13 509-512
  • [4] Decousus H(1994)Developments in inferior vena cava filters: a European viewpoint Semin Interv Radiol 11 349-357
  • [5] Leizorovics A(2000)Current practice of temporary vena cava filter insertion: a multicenter registry J Vasc Interv Radiol 11 83-88
  • [6] Parent F(1995)Worsening of proximal thrombosis after insertion of a temporary caval filter (3 cases) Rev Med Interne 16 351-353
  • [7] Tay KH(1998)A rare complication with an Antheor vena cava filter Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 21 165-167
  • [8] Martin ML(2002)Initial experience in humans with a new retrievable inferior vena cava filter Radiology 225 835-844
  • [9] Fry PD(2005)OptEase retrievable inferior vena cava filter: initial multicenter experience Vascular 13 286-289
  • [10] Neuerburg J(2005)The Jonas study: evaluation of the retrievability of the Cordis OptEase inferior vena cava filter J Vasc Interv Radiol 16 1439-1445