Not Straight and Not Straightforward: the Relationships Between Sexual Orientation, Sociosexuality, and Dark Triad Traits in Women

被引:23
作者
Semenyna S.W. [1 ]
Belu C.F. [2 ]
Vasey P.L. [1 ]
Lynne Honey P. [3 ]
机构
[1] Department of Psychology, University of Lethbridge, C866 University Hall, 4401 University Drive, Lethbridge, T1K 3M4, AB
[2] Department of Psychology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB
[3] Department of Psychology, MacEwan University, Edmonton, AB
关键词
Bisexuality; Dark triad; Female gynephilia; Female sexual orientation; Sociosexuality;
D O I
10.1007/s40806-017-0111-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Two studies examined the connection between women’s sexual orientation, their sociosexuality (i.e. willingness, attitudes, and desires associated with uncommitted sexual behaviour), and Dark Triad traits (Machiavellianism, narcissism, and psychopathy). Both studies found that moderately bisexual women reported less-restricted sociosexuality, as well as higher levels of Dark Triad traits––particularly psychopathy. In both studies, sexual orientation differences in Dark Triad traits were mediated by sociosexuality. Study 2 confirmed that the relationship between women’s sexual orientation and sociosexuality is curvilinear, with moderately bisexual women (i.e. Kinsey 1–2) reporting heightened sociosexuality compared to other groups. These results are consistent with the conclusion that moderate levels of female bisexuality may be a by-product of selection for traits that result in less restricted sociosexuality. At either end of the orientation continuum, women who report exclusive or near-exclusive homosexuality or heterosexuality report more restricted sociosexuality and lower Dark Triad scores, compared to women nearer to the middle of the continuum. As such, the aetiology of moderate bisexuality in women may be distinct from the aetiology of exclusive or near-exclusive homosexuality in women. © 2017, Springer International Publishing.
引用
收藏
页码:24 / 37
页数:13
相关论文
共 105 条
[1]  
Apostolou M., Why sexual plasticity in women is unlikely to be an adaptation to reduce conflict in polygynous marriages, Archives of Sexual Behavior, (2016)
[2]  
Apostolou M., The evolution of female same-sex attractions: the weak selection pressure hypothesis, Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences, (2016)
[3]  
Bailey J.M., What is sexual orientation and do women have one?, Contemporary perspectives on lesbian, gay, and bisexual identities, pp. 43-64, (2009)
[4]  
Bailey J.M., Gaulin S., Agyei Y., Gladue B.A., Effects of gender and sexual orientation on evolutionarily relevant aspects of human mating psychology, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, pp. 1081-1093, (1994)
[5]  
Bailey J.M., Kirk K.M., Zhu G., Dunne M.P., Martin N.G., Do individual differences in sociosexuality represent genetic or environmentally contingent strategies? Evidence from the Australian twin registry, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, pp. 537-545, (2000)
[6]  
Bailey J.M., Vasey P.L., Diamond L.D., Breedlove S.M., Vilain E., Epprecht M., Sexual orientation, controversy, and science, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 17, (2016)
[7]  
Barber N., On the relationship between country sex ratios and teen pregnancy rates: a replication, Cross-Cultural Research: The Journal of Comparative Social Science, 34, pp. 26-37, (2000)
[8]  
Baumeister R.F., Twenge J.M., Cultural suppression of female sexuality, Review of General Psychology, 6, pp. 166-203, (2002)
[9]  
Bogaert A.F., Ashton M.C., Lee K., Personality and sexual orientation: Extension to asexuality and the HEXACO model, Journal of Sex Research, (2017)
[10]  
Book A., Visser B.A., Volk A.A., Unpacking “evil”: claiming the core of the Dark Triad, Personality and Individual Differences, 73, pp. 29-38, (2015)