Standardizing an approach to the evaluation of implementation science proposals

被引：0
作者：
Erika L. Crable
Dea Biancarelli
Allan J. Walkey
Caitlin G. Allen
Enola K. Proctor
Mari-Lynn Drainoni
机构：
[1] Boston University School of Medicine,Evans Center for Implementation and Improvement Sciences
[2] Boston University School of Public Health,Department of Health Law, Policy & Management
[3] Boston University School of Medicine,Section of Pulmonary, Allergy, and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine
[4] Emory University,Behavioral Sciences and Health Education Department, Rollins School of Public Health
[5] The Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis,Center for Mental Health Services Research
[6] Boston University School of Medicine,Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine
[7] Edith Nourse Rogers Memorial VA Hospital,Center for Healthcare Organization and Implementation Research
来源：
Implementation Science | / 13卷
关键词：
Implementation research; Improvement research; Grant writing; Grant scoring;
D O I：
暂无
中图分类号：
学科分类号：
摘要：
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 85 条
[1]  
Glasgow RE(2003)Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition Am J Public Health 93 1261-1267
[2]  
Lichtenstein E(2015)Implementation science in cancer prevention and control: a decade of grant funding by the National Cancer Institute and future directions Implement Sci 10 909606-89
[3]  
Marcus AC(2013)Dissemination and implementation research funded by the US National Institutes of Health, 2005-2012 Nurs Res Pract 2013 77-76
[4]  
Neta G(2014)How research funding agencies support science integration into policy and practice: an international overview Implement Sci 9 65-168
[5]  
Sanchez MA(2012)Writing implementation research grant proposals: ten key ingredients Implement Sci 7 160-144
[6]  
Chambers DA(2007)Answering the call for a standard reliability measure for coding data Commun Methods Meas 1 e0130450-282
[7]  
Phillips SM(2011)Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda Admin Pol Ment Health 38 130-34
[8]  
Leyva B(2008)Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability Am Psychol 63 274-34
[9]  
Cynkin L(2015)Grant peer review: improving inter-rater reliability with training PLoS One 10 24-556
[10]  
Tinkle M(2007)The use of scoring rubrics: reliability, validity and educational consequences Educ Res Rev 2 139-90
123456789