Giant cell tumor of the bone: aggressive case initially treated with denosumab and intralesional surgery

被引:0
作者
Donald von Borstel
Roberto A. Taguibao
Nicholas A. Strle
Joseph E. Burns
机构
[1] Oklahoma State University Medical Center,Department of Radiology
[2] University of California,Department of Pathology
[3] Irvine,Department of Radiological Sciences
[4] UCI Medical Center,undefined
[5] University of California,undefined
[6] Irvine,undefined
[7] UCI Medical Center,undefined
来源
Skeletal Radiology | 2017年 / 46卷
关键词
Giant cell tumor; Denosumab; Imaging; MRI;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Giant cell tumor of the bone (GCTB) is a locally aggressive benign tumor, which has historically been treated with wide surgical excision. We report a case of a 29-year-old male with histology-proven GCTB of the distal ulna. The initial imaging study was a contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examination of the left wrist, which was from an outside facility performed before presenting to our institution. On the initial MRI, the lesion had homogenous T2-hyperintense and T1-hypointense signal with expansive remodeling of the osseous contour. A radiographic study performed upon presentation to our institution 1 month later showed progression of the lesion with atypical imaging characteristics. After confirming the diagnosis, denosumab therapy was implemented allowing for reconstitution of bone and intralesional treatment. The patient was treated with five doses of denosumab over the duration of 7 weeks. Therapeutic changes of the GCTB were evaluated by radiography and a post-treatment MRI. This MRI was interpreted as suspicious for worsening disease due to the imaging appearance of intralesional signal heterogeneity, increased perilesional fluid-like signal, and circumferential cortical irregularity. However, on subsequent intralesional curettage and bone autografting 6 weeks later, no giant cells were seen on the specimen. Thus, the appearance on the MRI, rather than representing a manifestation of lesion aggressiveness or a non-responding tumor, conversely represented the imaging appearance of a positive response to denosumab therapy. On follow-up evaluation, 5 months after intralesional treatment, the patient had recurrent disease and is now scheduled for wide-excision with joint prosthesis.
引用
收藏
页码:571 / 578
页数:7
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
Murphey M(2001)Imaging of giant cell tumor and giant cell reparative granuloma of bone: radiologic-pathologic correlation Radiographics 21 1203-309
[2]  
Nomikos G(2013)Giant cell tumor of bone: review, mimics, and new developments in treatment Radiographics 33 197-211
[3]  
Flemming D(2006)Giant cell tumor of bone: morphological, biological, and histogenetical aspects Int Orthop 30 484-9
[4]  
Gannon F(2002)RANK (receptor activotor of nuclear factor kappa B) and RANK ligand are expressed in giant cell tumors of bone Am J Clin Pathol 117 210-6
[5]  
Temple T(2013)Safety and efficacy of denosumab for adults and skeletally mature adolescents with giant cell tumour of bone: interim analysis of an open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 study Lancet Oncol 14 901-8
[6]  
Kransdorf M(2010)Denosumab in patients with giant-cell tumour of bone: an open-label, phase 2 study Lancet Oncol 11 275-80
[7]  
Chakarun C(2013)Denosumab for patients with persistent or relapsed hypercalcemia of malignancy despite recent bisphosphonate treatment J Natl Cancer Inst 105 1417-1420
[8]  
Forrester D(2012)Superiority of denosumab to zoledronic acid for prevention of skeletal-related events: A combined analysis of 3 pivotal, randomised, phase 3 trials Eur J Cancer 48 3082-92
[9]  
Gottsegen C(1983)Production of a mouse monoclonal antibody reactive with a human nuclear antigen associated with cell proliferation Int J Cancer 31 13-20
[10]  
Patel D(2012)Denosumab induces tumor reduction and bone formation in patients with giant-cell tumor of bone Clin Cancer Res 18 4415-24