Empirical ratio of the combined use of S-ketamine and propofol in electroconvulsive therapy and its impact on seizure quality

被引:0
作者
Alexander Sartorius
Juliane Beuschlein
Dmitry Remennik
Anna-Maria Pfeifer
Sebastian Karl
Jan Malte Bumb
Suna Su Aksay
Laura Kranaster
Christoph Janke
机构
[1] Heidelberg University,Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health
[2] Heidelberg University,Department of Anaesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim
[3] Heidelberg University,Department of Addictive Behaviour and Addiction Medicine, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Central Institute of Mental Health
来源
European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience | 2021年 / 271卷
关键词
ECT; Electroconvulsive therapy; Ketofol; (S-) ketamine; Propofol; Seizure quality; Recovery time;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is an effective treatment for depressive disorders. In certain cases, ECT-associated anaesthesia can be improved by the use of ketofol (i.e., S-ketamine + propofol). We aimed to evaluate the empirical mixing ratio of ketofol in these cases for better clinical implementation. We retrospectively investigated n = 52 patients who received 919 ECT sessions with S-ketamine plus propofol as anaesthetic agents. Several anaesthesia and ECT-related parameters including doses of S-ketamine and propofol were analysed. The mean empirically determined S-ketamine/propofol ratio was 1.38 (SD ± 0.57) for 919 individual ECT sessions and 1.52 (SD ± 0.62) for 52 patients, respectively. The mean relative dose was 0.72 (± 0.18) mg/kg S-ketamine and 0.54 (± 0.21) mg/kg propofol. Higher propofol dose was associated with poorer seizure quality. Seizure quality and time in recovery room were significantly influenced by age. Ketofol could be an option to exploit the advantageous qualities of S-ketamine and propofol, if both doses are reduced compared with single use of S-ketamine or propofol. Patients with poor seizure quality may benefit from lower propofol doses, which are applicable by the addition of ketamine. An empirically determined mixing ratio in favour of ketamine turned out to be preferable in a clinical setting. Recovery time was primarily prolonged by higher age rather than by ketamine dose, which had previously often been associated with a prolonged monitoring time in the recovery room. These new findings could improve electroconvulsive therapy and should be replicated in a prospective manner.
引用
收藏
页码:457 / 463
页数:6
相关论文
共 184 条
[1]  
Bauer M(2003)Efficacy and safety of electroconvulsive therapy in depressive disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Lancet 361 799-808
[2]  
Bschor T(2007)World federation of societies of biological psychiatry (WFSBP) guidelines for biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders in primary care World J Biol Psychiatry 8 67-104
[3]  
Pfennig A(2018)Anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 31 501-505
[4]  
Whybrow PC(2018)Anaesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy - new tricks for old drugs: a systematic review Acta Neuropsychiatr 30 61-69
[5]  
Angst J(2015)Ketamine as anesthetic agent in electroconvulsion therapy Anaesthesist 64 357-364
[6]  
Versiani M(2014)Propofol for ECT anesthesia a review of the literature J ECT 30 210-215
[7]  
Soehle M(2016)A Bayesian framework systematic review and meta-analysis of anesthetic agents effectiveness/tolerability profile in electroconvulsive therapy for major depression Sci Rep 6 19847-357
[8]  
Bochem J(2012)A comparison of propofol and thiopentone for electroconvulsive therapy J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol 28 353-1006
[9]  
Stripp TK(2010)Propofol and the electroencephalogram Clin Neurophysiol 121 998-19
[10]  
Jorgensen MB(2012)A within-subject comparison of propofol and methohexital anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy J ECT 28 14-758