Efficacy of deferred dosing of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in autologous hematopoietic transplantation for multiple myeloma

被引:0
作者
J E Cox
S Campos
J Wu
R May
H Liu
C A Ramos
G Carrum
H E Heslop
M K Brenner
R T Kamble
机构
[1] Center for Cell and Gene therapy,Department of Pharmacy
[2] The Methodist Hospital,undefined
[3] Center for Cell and Gene therapy,undefined
[4] Baylor College of Medicine,undefined
[5] The Methodist Hospital,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2014年 / 49卷
关键词
multiple myeloma; autologous transplant; G-CSF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Routine administration of G-CSF following autologous hematopoietic SCT (ASCT) expedites ANC recovery and reduces hospitalization by 1–2 days; it has no impact on febrile neutropenia, infections, morbidity, mortality, event-free survival or OS. To determine whether delayed G-CSF dosage could result in equivalent ANC recovery and thereby improve cost effectiveness, we deferred the administration of G-CSF until WBC recovery had begun. A total of 117 patients with multiple myeloma received ASCT from January 2005 to September 2012. Of these, 52 were in the conventional dosing group (CGD) and received G-CSF from Day +7 for a median of five doses. In the deferred dosing group (DGD), 65 patients received G-CSF from median day 14 post transplant for a median of zero doses. There was no difference between groups in the incidence or duration of febrile neutropenia, duration of ⩾grade III mucositis, weight gain, rash, engraftment syndrome or early death (100 days). The DGD group had a significantly longer time to neutrophil engraftment than the CGD group (15 days vs 12 days; P<0.0001), a longer period of severe neutropenia (<100/μL; 8 days vs 6 days; P<0.0001), longer treatment with intravenous antibiotics (7 days vs 5 days; P=0.016) and longer hospital stay (19 days vs 17 days; P=<0.0001). Although the cost of G-CSF was lower in the DGD group (mean $308 vs $2467), the additional hospitalization raised the median total cost of ASCT in this group by 17%. There was, however, no adverse effect of deferred dosing on the rate of febrile neuropenic episodes or Day 100 survival, so that deferred dosing of G-CSF may be suitable for patients receiving ASCT as outpatients, for whom longer hospital stay would not be an offsetting cost.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 222
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Associations of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor with toxicities and efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
    Ma, Sha
    Li, Hujun
    Zhou, Dian
    Zhang, Xiaotian
    Shi, Ming
    Cao, Jiang
    Qi, Yuekun
    Xia, Jieyun
    Liu, Yang
    Wang, Xue
    Li, Depeng
    Sang, Wei
    Yan, Zhiling
    Zhu, Feng
    Sun, Haiying
    Cheng, Hai
    Zheng, Junnian
    Xu, Kailin
    Li, Zhenyu
    Qi, Kunmin
    Wang, Ying
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2023, 25 (06) : 653 - 658
  • [42] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induces in vitro lymphangiogenesis
    Lee, Ae Sin
    Kim, Dal
    Wagle, Susbin Raj
    Lee, Jung Eun
    Jung, Yu Jin
    Kang, Kyung Pyo
    Lee, Sik
    Park, Sung Kwang
    Kim, Won
    BIOCHEMICAL AND BIOPHYSICAL RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS, 2013, 436 (04) : 565 - 570
  • [43] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for the treatment of recurrent miscarriage
    Scarpellini, F.
    Sbracia, M.
    JOURNAL OF REPRODUCTIVE IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 90 (02) : 158 - 159
  • [44] Serum granulocyte colony-stimulating factor levels in gliomas
    Yildiz, R.
    Coskun, U.
    Buyukberber, S.
    Sancak, B.
    Kaya, A. O.
    Gulbahar, O.
    Benekli, M.
    JOURNAL OF BUON, 2011, 16 (01): : 138 - 141
  • [45] MOBILIZATION OF CIRCULATING HEMATOPOIETIC STEM-CELLS WITH GRANULOCYTE-COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AFTER CHEMOTHERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE-MYELOMA
    OHLER, L
    SCHOLTEN, C
    REITER, E
    TIEFENGRABER, E
    JAGER, U
    STROBL, H
    LECHNER, K
    HOCKER, P
    GEISSLER, K
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 1993, 105 (20) : 580 - 584
  • [46] Characterization of peripheral blood stem cell grafts mobilized by granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and plerixafor compared with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone
    Gaugler, Beatrice
    Arbez, Jessy
    Legouill, Steven
    Tiberghien, Pierre
    Moreau, Philippe
    Derenne, Sophie
    Saas, Philippe
    Mohty, Mohamad
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2013, 15 (07) : 861 - 868
  • [47] EFFECTS OF GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR AND GRANULOCYTE-MACROPHAGE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR ON RESPIRATORY BURST ACTIVITY OF NEUTROPHILS IN PATIENTS WITH MYELODYSPLASTIC SYNDROMES
    OHSAKA, A
    KITAGAWA, S
    YUO, A
    MOTOYOSHI, K
    FURUSAWA, S
    MIURA, Y
    TAKAKU, F
    SAITO, M
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1993, 91 (02) : 308 - 313
  • [48] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor receptor: Stimulating granulopoiesis and much more
    Liongue, Clifford
    Wright, Craig
    Russell, Aaron P.
    Ward, Alister C.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY & CELL BIOLOGY, 2009, 41 (12) : 2372 - 2375
  • [49] Mechanism and Efficacy of Mobilization of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor in the Treatment of Chronic Hepatic Failure
    Xing Tong-Jing
    Xu Hong-Tao
    Xian Jian-Chun
    Shen Mei-Long
    Li Hao
    Ye Jun
    Zhang Li-Xin
    HEPATO-GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2013, 60 (121) : 170 - 175
  • [50] Structural Analysis of the Colony-Stimulating Factor 3 Gene of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor-Producing Urothelial Cancer
    Okuno, Yumiko
    Hori, Mai
    -Kato, Mami Hattori
    Fukuhara, Hiroshi
    Nomiya, Akira
    Mikami, Koji
    Takeuchi, Takumi
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2023, 15 (08)