Efficacy of deferred dosing of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in autologous hematopoietic transplantation for multiple myeloma

被引:0
|
作者
J E Cox
S Campos
J Wu
R May
H Liu
C A Ramos
G Carrum
H E Heslop
M K Brenner
R T Kamble
机构
[1] Center for Cell and Gene therapy,Department of Pharmacy
[2] The Methodist Hospital,undefined
[3] Center for Cell and Gene therapy,undefined
[4] Baylor College of Medicine,undefined
[5] The Methodist Hospital,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2014年 / 49卷
关键词
multiple myeloma; autologous transplant; G-CSF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Routine administration of G-CSF following autologous hematopoietic SCT (ASCT) expedites ANC recovery and reduces hospitalization by 1–2 days; it has no impact on febrile neutropenia, infections, morbidity, mortality, event-free survival or OS. To determine whether delayed G-CSF dosage could result in equivalent ANC recovery and thereby improve cost effectiveness, we deferred the administration of G-CSF until WBC recovery had begun. A total of 117 patients with multiple myeloma received ASCT from January 2005 to September 2012. Of these, 52 were in the conventional dosing group (CGD) and received G-CSF from Day +7 for a median of five doses. In the deferred dosing group (DGD), 65 patients received G-CSF from median day 14 post transplant for a median of zero doses. There was no difference between groups in the incidence or duration of febrile neutropenia, duration of ⩾grade III mucositis, weight gain, rash, engraftment syndrome or early death (100 days). The DGD group had a significantly longer time to neutrophil engraftment than the CGD group (15 days vs 12 days; P<0.0001), a longer period of severe neutropenia (<100/μL; 8 days vs 6 days; P<0.0001), longer treatment with intravenous antibiotics (7 days vs 5 days; P=0.016) and longer hospital stay (19 days vs 17 days; P=<0.0001). Although the cost of G-CSF was lower in the DGD group (mean $308 vs $2467), the additional hospitalization raised the median total cost of ASCT in this group by 17%. There was, however, no adverse effect of deferred dosing on the rate of febrile neuropenic episodes or Day 100 survival, so that deferred dosing of G-CSF may be suitable for patients receiving ASCT as outpatients, for whom longer hospital stay would not be an offsetting cost.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 222
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-induced mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for autologous and allogeneic transplantation
    Harada, M
    Teshima, T
    Fujisaki, T
    Mizuno, S
    Miyamoto, T
    Takamatsu, Y
    Kubota, A
    Ohno, Y
    Kuroiwa, M
    Takenaka, K
    Eto, T
    Akashi, K
    Gondo, H
    Okamura, T
    Inaba, S
    Niho, Y
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 38 : S115 - S119
  • [22] Serum levels of endogenous and exogenous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor after autologous blood stem cell transplantation
    Shimazaki, C
    Uchiyama, H
    Fujita, N
    Araki, SI
    Sudo, Y
    Yamagata, N
    Ashihara, E
    Goto, H
    Inaba, T
    Haruyama, H
    Nakagawa, M
    EXPERIMENTAL HEMATOLOGY, 1995, 23 (14) : 1497 - 1502
  • [23] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor utilization postautologous hematopoietic stem cell transplant in multiple myeloma patients: Does one size fit all?
    Jackson, Emily R.
    Jared, Jason R.
    Piccolo, Jennifer K.
    Woo, Kaitlin M.
    Mably, Mary S.
    Reed, Michael P.
    Callander, Natalie S.
    JOURNAL OF ONCOLOGY PHARMACY PRACTICE, 2019, 25 (05) : 1135 - 1141
  • [24] Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with vinorelbine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in multiple myeloma patients is reliable and cost effective
    M J Bargetzi
    J Passweg
    E Baertschi
    A Schoenenberger
    C Gwerder
    A Tichelli
    J Burger
    W Mingrone
    R Herrmann
    A Gratwohl
    M Wernli
    Bone Marrow Transplantation, 2003, 31 : 99 - 103
  • [25] Mobilization of peripheral blood progenitor cells with vinorelbine and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in multiple myeloma patients is reliable and cost effective
    Bargetzi, MJ
    Passweg, J
    Baertschi, E
    Schoenenberger, A
    Gwerder, C
    Tichelli, A
    Burger, J
    Mingrone, W
    Herrmann, R
    Gratwohl, A
    Wernli, M
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2003, 31 (02) : 99 - 103
  • [26] Efficacy of subcutaneous granulocyte colony-stimulating factor infusion for treating thin endometrium
    Banerjee, Kaberi
    Singla, Bhavana
    Verma, Priyanka
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE-CERM, 2022, 49 (01): : 70 - 73
  • [27] Cyclophosphamide plus granulocyte-colony stimulating factor for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma
    Lin, Tung-Liang
    Wang, Po-Nan
    Kuo, Ming-Chung
    Hung, Yu-Hsing
    Chang, Hung
    Tang, Tzung-Chih
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2016, 31 (05) : 423 - 428
  • [28] Stem Cell Mobilization in Multiple Myeloma: Comparing Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide plus /- Plerixafor versus Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor plus /- Plerixafor in the Lenalidomide Era
    Johnsrud, Andrew
    Ladha, Abdullah
    Muffly, Lori
    Shiraz, Parveen
    Goldstein, Gary
    Osgood, Victoria
    Shizuru, Judith A.
    Johnston, Laura
    Arai, Sally
    Weng, Wen-Kai
    Lowsky, Robert
    Rezvani, Andrew R.
    Meyer, Everett H.
    Frank, Matthew J.
    Negrin, Robert S.
    Miklos, David B.
    Sidana, Surbhi
    TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY, 2021, 27 (07): : 590.e1 - 590.e8
  • [29] A novel function of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in mobilization of human hematopoietic progenitor cells
    Zhang, Yun
    Cheng, Guang
    Yang, Kun
    Fan, Rong
    Xu, Zhuwei
    Chen, Lihua
    Li, Qi
    Yang, Angang
    Jin, Boquan
    IMMUNOLOGY AND CELL BIOLOGY, 2009, 87 (05) : 428 - 432
  • [30] Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor exacerbates hematopoietic stem cell injury after irradiation
    Li, Chengcheng
    Lu, Lu
    Zhang, Junling
    Huang, Song
    Xing, Yonghua
    Zhao, Mingfeng
    Zhou, Daohong
    Li, Deguan
    Meng, Aimin
    CELL AND BIOSCIENCE, 2015, 5