Efficacy of deferred dosing of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in autologous hematopoietic transplantation for multiple myeloma

被引:0
|
作者
J E Cox
S Campos
J Wu
R May
H Liu
C A Ramos
G Carrum
H E Heslop
M K Brenner
R T Kamble
机构
[1] Center for Cell and Gene therapy,Department of Pharmacy
[2] The Methodist Hospital,undefined
[3] Center for Cell and Gene therapy,undefined
[4] Baylor College of Medicine,undefined
[5] The Methodist Hospital,undefined
来源
Bone Marrow Transplantation | 2014年 / 49卷
关键词
multiple myeloma; autologous transplant; G-CSF;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Routine administration of G-CSF following autologous hematopoietic SCT (ASCT) expedites ANC recovery and reduces hospitalization by 1–2 days; it has no impact on febrile neutropenia, infections, morbidity, mortality, event-free survival or OS. To determine whether delayed G-CSF dosage could result in equivalent ANC recovery and thereby improve cost effectiveness, we deferred the administration of G-CSF until WBC recovery had begun. A total of 117 patients with multiple myeloma received ASCT from January 2005 to September 2012. Of these, 52 were in the conventional dosing group (CGD) and received G-CSF from Day +7 for a median of five doses. In the deferred dosing group (DGD), 65 patients received G-CSF from median day 14 post transplant for a median of zero doses. There was no difference between groups in the incidence or duration of febrile neutropenia, duration of ⩾grade III mucositis, weight gain, rash, engraftment syndrome or early death (100 days). The DGD group had a significantly longer time to neutrophil engraftment than the CGD group (15 days vs 12 days; P<0.0001), a longer period of severe neutropenia (<100/μL; 8 days vs 6 days; P<0.0001), longer treatment with intravenous antibiotics (7 days vs 5 days; P=0.016) and longer hospital stay (19 days vs 17 days; P=<0.0001). Although the cost of G-CSF was lower in the DGD group (mean $308 vs $2467), the additional hospitalization raised the median total cost of ASCT in this group by 17%. There was, however, no adverse effect of deferred dosing on the rate of febrile neuropenic episodes or Day 100 survival, so that deferred dosing of G-CSF may be suitable for patients receiving ASCT as outpatients, for whom longer hospital stay would not be an offsetting cost.
引用
收藏
页码:219 / 222
页数:3
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Efficacy of deferred dosing of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in autologous hematopoietic transplantation for multiple myeloma
    Cox, J. E.
    Campos, S.
    Wu, J.
    May, R.
    Liu, H.
    Ramos, C. A.
    Carrum, G.
    Heslop, H. E.
    Brenner, M. K.
    Kamble, R. T.
    BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 49 (02) : 219 - 222
  • [2] A case of multiple myeloma producing granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
    Usuda, H
    Naito, M
    Ohyach, K
    Iizumi, A
    PATHOLOGY INTERNATIONAL, 1997, 47 (12) : 866 - 869
  • [3] Efficacy of biosimilar granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus originator granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in peripheral blood stem cell mobilization in de novo multiple myeloma patients
    Martin, Massimo
    Recchia, Anna Grazia
    Moscato, Tiziana
    Fedele, Roberta
    Neri, Santo
    Gentile, Iviassimo
    Alati, Caterina
    Vincelli, Iolanda Donatella
    Piro, Eugenio
    Penna, Giuseppa
    Musolino, Catemna
    Ronco, Francesca
    Molica, Stefano
    Morabito, Fortunato
    CYTOTHERAPY, 2015, 17 (10) : 1485 - 1493
  • [4] Randomized comparison of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor versus granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor plus intensive chemotherapy for peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma
    Arora, M
    Burns, LJ
    Barker, JN
    Miller, JS
    Defor, TE
    Olujohungbe, AB
    Weisdorf, DJ
    BIOLOGY OF BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION, 2004, 10 (06) : 395 - 404
  • [5] MOBILIZATION OF HEMATOPOIETIC STEM CELLS WITH CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE OR CYTARABINE IN COMBINATION WITH GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR IN PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE MYELOMA, WHO ARE CANDIDATES FOR AUTOLOGOUS STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION
    Babenetskaya, D., V
    Motorin, D., V
    Petrov, A., V
    Alekseeva, Yu. A.
    Zaritskey, A. Yu
    GEMATOLOGIYA I TRANSFUZIOLOGIYA, 2017, 62 (04): : 180 - 187
  • [6] Hematopoietic Progenitor Cell Mobilization Using Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide and Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor for Multiple Myeloma
    Shimura, Yuji
    Kuroda, Junya
    Uchiyama, Hitoji
    Kawata-Iida, Eri
    Tsutsumi, Yasuhiko
    Nagoshi, Hisao
    Mizutani, Shinsuke
    Yamamoto-Sugitani, Mio
    Matsumoto, Yosuke
    Kobayashi, Tsutomu
    Horiike, Shigeo
    Shimazaki, Chihiro
    Kaneko, Hiroto
    Kobayashi, Yutaka
    Taniwaki, Masafumi
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2013, 28 (05) : 368 - 373
  • [7] Predictors of unsuccessful mobilization with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor alone in patients undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    Chow, Signy
    Lazo-Langner, Alejandro
    Ormond, George
    Howson-Jan, Kang
    Xenocostas, Anargyros
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL APHERESIS, 2013, 28 (04) : 285 - 292
  • [8] Revisiting the Utility of Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor Post-Autologous Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation for Outpatient-Based Transplantations
    Portuguese, Andrew J.
    Holmberg, Leona
    Hill, Geoffrey R.
    Lee, Stephanie J.
    Green, Damian J.
    Mielcarek, Marco
    Gooley, Ted
    Yeh, Albert C.
    TRANSPLANTATION AND CELLULAR THERAPY, 2023, 29 (11): : 696.e1 - 696.e7
  • [9] DETECTION OF THE GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR RECEPTOR USING BIOTINYLATED GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR - PRESENCE OF GRANULOCYTE COLONY-STIMULATING FACTOR RECEPTOR ON CD34-POSITIVE HEMATOPOIETIC PROGENITOR CELLS
    SHIMODA, K
    OKAMURA, S
    HARADA, N
    NIHO, Y
    RESEARCH IN EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE, 1992, 192 (04) : 245 - 255
  • [10] The use of granulocyte colony stimulating factor after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation
    Farkas, F.
    Mistrik, M.
    Batorova, A.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2019, 120 (09): : 668 - 672