Quasi-static cyclic in-plane testing of masonry walls strengthened with a single-sided fabric-reinforced cementitious matrix overlay and flexible anchorage

被引:0
作者
Türkmen Ö.S. [1 ]
De Vries B.T. [2 ]
Wijte S.N.M. [1 ]
Vermeltfoort A.T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Section Structural Design, Department of the Built Environment, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O. Box 513, Eindhoven
[2] QuakeShield (Joint Venture Royal Oosterhof Holman and SealteQ Group), P.O. Box 6, Grijpskerk
关键词
Experiment; FRCM; Masonry; Retrofit; Seismic; Shear;
D O I
10.1007/s41024-019-0043-y
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
An experimental program was undertaken to assess the effectiveness of a new retrofit concept to improve the in-plane behavior of unreinforced clay brick walls by means of full-scale static-cyclic in-plane tests. The proposed seismic retrofit system combines two standalone retrofit measures for in-plane and out-of-plane strengthening of masonry walls. The in-plane reinforcement consists of a single-sided carbon Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix (FRCM) overlay, and anchors embedded with a flexible adhesive in the masonry. The out-of-plane reinforcement, which consisted of deep mounted Carbon Fibre Reinforced Polymer (CFRP) strips embedded with a flexible adhesive in the masonry, was included in the study to investigate the possible degrading effects of the deep groove on the in-plane behavior. A total of nine full-scale reinforced masonry walls with three different geometries were tested under three different axial loads. None of the specimens showed shear failure at both the reinforced and the as-built side. Cracking predominantly occurred at the interface between the bottommost bed-joint and the foundation beam. The out-of-plane reinforcement did not affect the in-plane strength, as no vertical shear cracks occurred. Moreover, it was found that the anchors increased both the rocking and sliding resistance of the walls. An analytical model was proposed covering the rocking and sliding resistance of the reinforced walls, providing a good approximation of the experimentally obtained in-plane strengths. Additional pull-out experiments showed that the testing scenario where the tensile forces in the anchor were transferred to CFRP strip, provided a good approximation of the analytically determined anchorage strength. © 2019, The Author(s).
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Bourne S., Oates S., Development of statistical geomechanical models for forecasting seismicity induced by gas production from the Groningen field, Neth J Geosci, 96, 5, pp. S175-S182, (2017)
[2]  
Van Thienen-Visser K., Breunese J.N., Induced seismicity of the Groningen gas field: history and recent developments, Lead Edge, 34, 6, pp. 664-671, (2015)
[3]  
Turkmen O.S., de Vries B.T., Wijte S.N.M., Vermeltfoort (, In-Plane Behavior of Clay Brick Masonry Wallettes Retrofitted with Single-Sided Fabric-Reinforced Cementitious Matrix and Deep Mounted Carbon Fibre Strips, (2019)
[4]  
Triantafillou T.C., Strengthening of masonry structures using epoxy-bonded FRP laminates, J Compos Constr, 2, 2, pp. 96-104, (1998)
[5]  
Papanicolaou C.G., Triantafillou T.C., Papathanasiou M., Karlos K., Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading, Mater Struct, 41, 1, pp. 143-157, (2007)
[6]  
Maalej M., Lin V., Nguyen M., Quek S., Engineered cementitious composites for effective strengthening of unreinforced masonry walls, Eng Struct, 32, 8, pp. 2432-2439, (2010)
[7]  
Parisi F., Iovinella I., Balsamo A., Augenti N., Prota A., In-plane behaviour of tuff masonry strengthened with inorganic matrix-grid composites, Compos B Eng, 45, 1, pp. 1657-1666, (2013)
[8]  
Bilotta A., Ceroni F., Nigro E., Pecce M., Experimental tests on FRCM strengthening systems for tuff masonry elements, Constr Build Mater, 138, pp. 114-133, (2017)
[9]  
Nanni A., A new tool for concrete and masonry repair, Concr Int, 34, 4, pp. 1-7, (2012)
[10]  
Papanicolaou C.G., Triantafillou T.C., Papathanasiou M., Karlos K., Textile reinforced mortar (TRM) versus FRP as strengthening material of URM walls: out-of-plane cyclic loading, Mater Struct, 41, 1, pp. 143-157, (2008)