Refining operation guidelines with model-checking-aided FRAM to improve manufacturing processes: a case study for aeroengine blade forging

被引:0
作者
Zixia Zheng
Jin Tian
Tingdi Zhao
机构
[1] Beihang University,School of Reliability and Systems Engineering
来源
Cognition, Technology & Work | 2016年 / 18卷
关键词
Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM); Manufacturing processes; Finite State Machine (FSM); Model checking;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
With the aid of the Finite State Machine (FSM) and formal verification, a framework of updated Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) is proposed to refine operation guidelines as such and hence improves manufacturing processes by reducing risks of unqualified products during manufacturing operations. Firstly, the FRAM is used to model a manufacturing process in terms of the corresponding guideline, taking into account all the basic activities each with their performance variability and the potential couplings among the activities. Secondly, based on the FRAM model further interpreted with FSM, the model checker SPIN is adopted to achieve the exhaustive search (in the sense of execution) for the paths leading to manufacturing risks, which supports to illustrate how the performance variability in the activities couples and finally causes violation of quality control requirements. Finally, possible inadequacies and deficiencies of the operations are identified and measures for refining the guideline are developed to minimize the risks due to the inherent issues of specification in the guideline. In a case study, the proposed framework is applied to a typical manufacturing process prone to risks, i.e., forging of aeroengine titanium alloy blades, and the analysis results indicate practicality of the framework, as well as effectiveness of the guideline refinements.
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 791
页数:14
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]  
Alper SJ(2009)A systematic review of safety violations in industry Accid Anal Prev 41 739-754
[2]  
Karsh BT(1998)Model checking of hierarchical state machines Acm Sigsoft Softw Eng Notes 23 273-303
[3]  
Alur R(1996)UPPAAL: a tool suite for the automatic veri cation of real-time systems Lect Notes Comput Sci 1066 243-1498
[4]  
Bengtsson J(2011)The use of functional resonance analysis method (FRAM) in a mid-air collision to understand some characteristics of the air traffic management system resilience Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96 1482-643
[5]  
Larsen KG(1996)Formal methods: state of the art and future directions ACM Comput Surv 28 626-8
[6]  
Larsson F(2015)Where the rubber meets the road: using FRAM to align work-as-imagined with work-as-done when implementing clinical guidelines Implement Sci 10 1-3672
[7]  
Pettersson P(2010)Joint production control and product quality decision making in a failure prone multiple-product manufacturing system Int J Prod Res 50 3661-1275
[8]  
Wang Y(2010)Comparing a multi-linear (STEP) and systemic (FRAM) method for accident analysis Reliab Eng Syst Saf 95 1269-205
[9]  
Carvalho PVRD(2012)Coping with complexity: past, present and future Cogn Technol Work 14 199-295
[10]  
Clarke EM(1997)The model checker SPIN IEEE Trans Softw Eng 23 279-356