Protecting the public interest when regulating health professionals providing virtual care: a scoping review protocol

被引:0
作者
Kathleen Leslie
Sophia Myles
Tracey L. Adams
Catharine Schiller
Jacob Shelley
Sioban Nelson
机构
[1] Athabasca University,Faculty of Health Disciplines
[2] Western University,Department of Sociology
[3] University of Northern British Columbia,School of Nursing
[4] Western University,Faculty of Law and School of Health Studies
[5] University of Toronto,Faculty of Nursing
来源
Systematic Reviews | / 12卷
关键词
Patient safety; Professional regulation; Public interest; Telehealth; Virtual care; Licensure; Telemedicine;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 49 条
[1]  
Biggar MA(2020)How can we make health regulation more humane? A quality improvement approach to understanding complainant and practitioner experiences J Med Regul 106 7-15
[2]  
Lobigs LM(2016)Professional self-regulation and the public interest in Canada Prof Prof 6 1587-40
[3]  
Fletcher M(2019)Acting in the public interest: Learnings and commentary on the occupational licensure literature J Nurs Regul 10 1-S36
[4]  
Man M(2020)Use and content of primary care office-based vs telemedicine care visits during the COVID-19 pandemic in the US JAMA Netw Open 3 e2021476-243,246
[5]  
Adams TL(2021)NCSBN’s Environmental Scan COVID-19 and Its Impact on Nursing and Regulation J Nurs Regul 11 S1-2183
[6]  
Benton DC(2020)COVID-19: an accidental catalyst for change in the Canadian health care system. B.C Med J 62 242-2126
[7]  
Cleghorn J(2020)Perspective: ensuring and sustaining a pandemic workforce N Engl J Med 382 2181-473
[8]  
Coghlan A(2020)Updated methodological guidance for the conduct of scoping reviews JBI Evid Synth 18 2119-24
[9]  
Damgaard G(2018)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. The PRISMA-ScR Statement Ann Intern Med 169 467-undefined
[10]  
Doumit MA(2015)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement Syst Rev 4 1-undefined