Simulations for the development of a ground motion model for induced seismicity in the Groningen gas field, The Netherlands

被引:0
作者
B. Edwards
B. Zurek
E. van Dedem
P. J. Stafford
S. Oates
J. van Elk
B. deMartin
J. J. Bommer
机构
[1] University of Liverpool,Department of Earth, Ocean and Ecological Sciences
[2] ExxonMobil Upstream Research Company,Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
[3] Shell Global Solutions International B.V.,undefined
[4] Imperial College London,undefined
[5] Nederlandse Aardolie Maatschappij B.V. (NAM),undefined
来源
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering | 2019年 / 17卷
关键词
Earthquake ground motion; Duration; Stochastic simulation; Finite-difference simulation; Seismic hazard;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We present simulations performed for the development of a ground motion model for induced earthquakes in the Groningen gas field. The largest recorded event, with M3.5, occurred in 2012 and, more recently, a M3.4 event in 2018 led to recorded ground accelerations exceeding 0.1 g. As part of an extensive hazard and risk study, it has been necessary to predict ground motions for scenario earthquakes up to M7. In order to achieve this, while accounting for the unique local geology, a range of simulations have been performed using both stochastic and full-waveform finite-difference simulations. Due to frequency limitations and lack of empirical calibration of the latter approach, input simulations for the ground motion model used in the hazard and risk analyses have been performed with a finite-fault stochastic method. However, in parallel, extensive studies using the finite-difference simulations have guided inputs and modelling considerations for these simulations. Three approaches are used: (1) the finite-fault stochastic method, (2) elastic point- and (3) finite-source 3D finite-difference simulations. We present a summary of the methods and their synthesis, including both amplitudes and durations within the context of the hazard and risk model. A unique form of wave-propagation with strong lateral focusing and defocusing is evident in both peak amplitudes and durations. The results clearly demonstrate the need for a locally derived ground motion model and the potential for reduction in aleatory variability in moving toward a path-specific fully non-ergodic model.
引用
收藏
页码:4441 / 4456
页数:15
相关论文
共 116 条
  • [1] Abrahamson NA(1992)A stable algorithm for regression-analyses using the random effects model Bull Seismol Soc Am 82 505-510
  • [2] Youngs RR(2014)Summary of the ASK14 ground motion relation for active crustal regions Earthq Spectra 30 1025-1055
  • [3] Abrahamson NA(2016)Physically parameterized prediction equations for significant duration in active crustal regions Earthq Spectra 32 2057-2081
  • [4] Silva WJ(2016)Validation of duration parameters from SCEC broadband platform simulated ground motions Seismol Res Lett 87 1355-1362
  • [5] Kamai R(2014)Empirical ground-motion models for point- and extended-source crustal earthquake scenarios in Europe and the Middle East Bull Earthq Eng 12 359-387
  • [6] Afshari K(2015)Ground-motion prediction equation for small-to-moderate events at short hypocentral distances, with application to induced-seismicity hazards Bull Seismol Soc Am 105 981-992
  • [7] Stewart JP(2018)Mapping the uncertainty in modulus reduction and damping curves into the uncertainty of site amplification factors Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 12 391-430
  • [8] Afshari K(2014)Pan-European ground-motion prediction equations for the average horizontal component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-damped PSA at spectral periods up to 3.0 s using the RESORCE dataset Bull Earthq Eng 31 661-698
  • [9] Stewart JP(2015)A SSHAC level 3 probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for a new-build nuclear site in South Africa Earthq Spectra 106 158-173
  • [10] Akkar S(2016)Developing an application-specific ground-motion model for induced seismicity Bull Seismol Soc Am 96 s203-s213