Rights-based food systems and the goals of food systems reform

被引:0
作者
Molly D. Anderson
机构
[1] Food Systems Integrity,
来源
Agriculture and Human Values | 2008年 / 25卷
关键词
Rights-based approach; Food system; Local food; Food democracy; Ecological integrity; Sustainability;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Food security, health, decent livelihoods, gender equity, safe working conditions, cultural identity and participation in cultural life are basic human rights that can be achieved at least in part through the food system. But current trends in the US prevent full realization of these economic, social, and cultural rights (ESCR) for residents, farmers, and wageworkers in the food system. Supply chains that strive to meet the goals of social justice, economic equity, and environmental quality better than the dominant globalized food value networks are gaining popularity in the US. However, achieving important human rights has become conflated with other goals of food system reform over the past decade, such as being “community-based,” local, and sustainable. This conflation confuses means, ends, and complementary goals; and it may lead activists trying to help communities to regain control of their food system choices into less productive strategies. This paper introduces a new concept, rights-based food systems (RBFS), and explores its connection with localization and sustainability. The core criteria of RBFS are democratic participation in food system choices affecting more than one sector; fair, transparent access by producers to all necessary resources for food production and marketing; multiple independent buyers; absence of human exploitation; absence of resource exploitation; and no impingement on the ability of people in other locales to meet this set of criteria. Localization and a community base can help achieve RBFS by facilitating food democracy and reducing environmental exploitation, primarily by lowering environmental costs due to long-distance transportation. Sustainability per se is an empty goal for food system reform, unless what will be sustained and for whom are specified. The RBFS concept helps to clarify what is worth sustaining and who is most susceptible to neglect in attempts to reform food systems. Localization can be a means toward sustainability if local food systems are also RBFS.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [1] Boele R(2001)Shell, Nigeria and the Ogoni. A study in unsustainable development: II. Corporate social responsibility and “stakeholder management” versus a rights-based approach to sustainable development Sustainable Development 9 121-135
  • [2] Fabig H(2005)Multifunctional agriculture in the United States Bioscience 55 27-38
  • [3] Wheeler D(2006)Avoiding the local trap: Scale and food systems in planning research Journal of Planning Education & Research 26 195-207
  • [4] Boody G(2004)Poverty and obesity: The role of energy density and energy costs American Journal of Clinical Nutrition 79 6-16
  • [5] Vondracek B(2000)Reading the space of the farmers’ market: A case study from the United Kingdom Sociologia Ruralis 40 285-299
  • [6] Andow DA(2005)What is sustainable development? Goals, indicators, values, and practice Environment 47 8-21
  • [7] Krinke M(2002)Neighborhood characteristics associated with the location of food stores and food service places American Journal of Preventive Medicine 22 23-29
  • [8] Westra J(1999)Supermarket access in the inner city Journal of Retailing & Consumer Services 6 141-145
  • [9] Zimmerman J(2006)Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004 Journal of the American Medical Association 295 1549-1555
  • [10] Welle P(2005)Developing rights? Relating discourse to context and practice IDS Bulletin 36 1-8