Non-response in a survey of physicians on end-of-life care for the elderly

被引:9
作者
Kühne F. [1 ]
Behmann M. [1 ]
Bisson S. [1 ]
Walter U. [1 ]
Schneider N. [1 ]
机构
[1] Hannover Medical School, Institute for Epidemiology, Social Medicine and Healthcare Systems Research, 30625 Hannover
关键词
General Practitioner; Palliative Care; Public Health Insurance; Free Text; Palliative Medicine;
D O I
10.1186/1756-0500-4-367
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Physicians are quite often surveyed with the aim to investigate their opinions regarding provision and improvement of health care. However, in many cases response rates tend to be rather low. The aim of the study is to reflect methodological aspects regarding survey conduction and to analyse factors that cause physicians to take part in a study on delivering end-of-life care for the elderly. Methods. N = 4,727 physicians in Lower Saxony, Germany, received a standardised questionnaire on their attitudes about end-of-life care for the elderly. Non-responders were asked to state the reasons for non-participation. Comparison of the sociodemographic characteristics between responders and non-responders, and evaluation of the reasons for non-participation were made. Results: The response rate to the questionnaire on end-of-life care for the elderly was 40% (n = 1,892). Of the non-responders to the questionnaire, 12.8% (n = 364) stated the reasons for non-participation. Overall, the response rate to the questionnaire varied with specialty and location of the practice: radiotherapists answered significantly more frequently than other categories of physician (e.g. general practitioners) and physicians in rural areas significantly more frequently than their colleagues in urban areas. The reasons most frequently given for non-participation were "Not concerned with the subject" and "No time". Conclusions: The varying rates of response indicate that the survey was not sufficiently relevant to all groups of physicians, or that the awareness of the topic may be partly underdeveloped. © 2011 Schneider et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Cook J.V., Dickinson H.O., Eccles M.P., Response rates in postal surveys of healthcare professionals between 1996 and 2005: An observational study, BMC Health Serv Research, 9, (2009)
[2]  
Ransdell L.B., Maximizing response rate in questionnaire research, Am J Health Behav, 20, pp. 50-56, (1996)
[3]  
Barclay S., Todd C., Finlay I., Grande G., Wyatt P., Not another questionnaire! Maximizing the response rate, predicting non-response and assessing non-response bias in postal questionnaire studies of GPs, Family Practice, 19, 1, pp. 105-111, (2002)
[4]  
Asch D.A., Jedrziewski M.K., Christakis N.A., Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals, Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 50, 10, pp. 1129-1136, (1997)
[5]  
Cummings S.M., Savitz L.A., Konrad T.R., Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires, Health Services Research, 35, 6, pp. 1347-1355, (2001)
[6]  
Sibbald B., Addington-Hall J., Brenneman D., Freeling P., Telephone versus postal surveys of general practitioners: Methodological considerations, British Journal of General Practice, 44, 384, pp. 297-300, (1994)
[7]  
Delnevo C.D., Abatemarco D.J., Steinberg M.B., Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive, American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 26, 3, pp. 234-236, (2004)
[8]  
Bjertnaes O.A., Garratt A., Botten G., Nonresponse bias and cost-effectiveness in a Norwegian survey of family physicians, Eval Health Prof, 31, pp. 65-80, (2008)
[9]  
Dillman D.A., The design and administration of mail surveys, Annu Rev Sociol, 17, pp. 225-249, (1991)
[10]  
Splieth C.H., Steffen H., Welk A., Schwahn C., Responder and nonresponder analysis for a caries prevention program, Caries Research, 39, 4, pp. 269-272, (2005)