A systematic review of landslide probability mapping using logistic regression

被引:2
作者
M. E. A. Budimir
P. M. Atkinson
H. G. Lewis
机构
[1] University of Southampton,Faculty of Social and Human Sciences
[2] University of Southampton,Faculty of Engineering and the Environment
来源
Landslides | 2015年 / 12卷
关键词
Landslides; Logistic regression; Covariates; Systematic literature review search;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Logistic regression studies which assess landslide susceptibility are widely available in the literature. However, a global review of these studies to synthesise and compare the results does not exist. There are currently no guidelines for the selection of covariates to be used in logistic regression analysis, and as such, the covariates selected vary widely between studies. An inventory of significant covariates associated with landsliding produced from the full set of such studies globally would be a useful aid to the selection of covariates in future logistic regression studies. Thus, studies using logistic regression for landslide susceptibility estimation published in the literature were collated, and a database was created of the significant factors affecting the generation of landslides. The database records the paper the data were taken from, the year of publication, the approximate longitude and latitude of the study area, the trigger method (where appropriate) and the most dominant type of landslides occurring in the study area. The significant and non-significant (at the 95 % confidence level) covariates were recorded, as well as their coefficient, statistical significance and unit of measurement. The most common statistically significant covariate used in landslide logistic regression was slope, followed by aspect. The significant covariates related to landsliding varied for earthquake-induced landslides compared to rainfall-induced landslides, and between landslide type. More importantly, the full range of covariates used was identified along with their frequencies of inclusion. The analysis showed that there needs to be more clarity and consistency in the methodology for selecting covariates for logistic regression analysis and in the metrics included when presenting the results. Several recommendations for future studies were given.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 436
页数:17
相关论文
共 183 条
  • [31] van Westen CJ(2007)Vulnerability assessment of rainfall-induced debris flows in Taiwan Nat Hazards 43 223-244
  • [32] Chacon J(1993)Landslide processes and landslide susceptibility analysis from an upland watershed—a case-study from St-Andrew, Jamaica, West-Indies Eng Geol 34 53-79
  • [33] Irigaray C(2010)Global earthquake casualties due to secondary effects: a quantitative analysis for improving rapid loss analyses Nat Hazards 52 319-328
  • [34] Fernandez T(2013)Landslide hazard and risk assessment using semi-automatically created landslide inventories Geomorphology 184 139-150
  • [35] El Hamdouni R(2002)Rock falls induced by earthquakes: a statistical approach Soil Dynam Earthquake Eng 22 565-577
  • [36] Chang KT(2008)Topographic site effects and the location of earthquake induced landslides Earth Planet Sci Lett 275 221-232
  • [37] Chiang SH(2006)Global landslide and avalanche hotspots Landslides 3 159-173
  • [38] Hsu ML(2007)Landslide susceptibility assessment using “weights-of-evidence” applied to a study area at the Jurassic escarpment (SW-Germany) Geomorphology 86 12-24
  • [39] Chung CJF(2011)Landslide susceptibility mapping on Panaon Island, Philippines using a geographic information system Environ Earth Sci 62 935-951
  • [40] Fabbri AG(2003)Using multiple logistic regression and GIS technology to predict landslide hazard in northeast Kansas, USA Eng Geol 69 331-343