A systematic review of landslide probability mapping using logistic regression

被引:2
作者
M. E. A. Budimir
P. M. Atkinson
H. G. Lewis
机构
[1] University of Southampton,Faculty of Social and Human Sciences
[2] University of Southampton,Faculty of Engineering and the Environment
来源
Landslides | 2015年 / 12卷
关键词
Landslides; Logistic regression; Covariates; Systematic literature review search;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Logistic regression studies which assess landslide susceptibility are widely available in the literature. However, a global review of these studies to synthesise and compare the results does not exist. There are currently no guidelines for the selection of covariates to be used in logistic regression analysis, and as such, the covariates selected vary widely between studies. An inventory of significant covariates associated with landsliding produced from the full set of such studies globally would be a useful aid to the selection of covariates in future logistic regression studies. Thus, studies using logistic regression for landslide susceptibility estimation published in the literature were collated, and a database was created of the significant factors affecting the generation of landslides. The database records the paper the data were taken from, the year of publication, the approximate longitude and latitude of the study area, the trigger method (where appropriate) and the most dominant type of landslides occurring in the study area. The significant and non-significant (at the 95 % confidence level) covariates were recorded, as well as their coefficient, statistical significance and unit of measurement. The most common statistically significant covariate used in landslide logistic regression was slope, followed by aspect. The significant covariates related to landsliding varied for earthquake-induced landslides compared to rainfall-induced landslides, and between landslide type. More importantly, the full range of covariates used was identified along with their frequencies of inclusion. The analysis showed that there needs to be more clarity and consistency in the methodology for selecting covariates for logistic regression analysis and in the metrics included when presenting the results. Several recommendations for future studies were given.
引用
收藏
页码:419 / 436
页数:17
相关论文
共 183 条
  • [1] Akgun A(2012)Application of remote sensing data and GIS for landslide risk assessment as an environmental threat to Izmir city (west Turkey) Environ Monit Assess 184 5453-5470
  • [2] Kincal C(1998)Generalised linear modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the central Apennines, Italy Comput Geosci 24 373-385
  • [3] Pradhan B(2011)Autologistic modelling of susceptibility to landsliding in the Central Apennines, Italy Geomorphology 130 55-64
  • [4] Atkinson PM(2005)The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yahiko Mountains, Central Japan Geomorphology 65 15-31
  • [5] Massari R(2001)Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques Earth Surf Proc Land 26 1251-1263
  • [6] Atkinson PM(2010)Landslide susceptibility assessment of the Kralovany-Liptovsky Mikulas railway case study Phys Chem Earth 35 162-171
  • [7] Massari R(2002)Earthquake-induced landslides in central America Eng Geol 63 189-220
  • [8] Ayalew L(1991)The world landslide problem Episodes 14 52-61
  • [9] Yamagishi H(2005)Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation Nat Hazard Earth Syst Sci 5 853-862
  • [10] Baeza C(1991)GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard Earth Surf Proc Land 16 427-445