Performance Analysis and Evaluation of a Supercritical CO2 Rankine Cycle Coupled with an Absorption Refrigeration Cycle

被引:0
作者
Yi Chen
Dongjie Xu
Zheng Chen
Xiang Gao
Fukang Ren
Wei Han
机构
[1] China Electric Power Planning & Engineering Institute,College of Energy Engineering
[2] Zhejiang University,Power and Mechanical Engineering
[3] North China Electric Power University,Institute of Engineering Thermophysics
[4] Chinese Academy of Sciences,undefined
来源
Journal of Thermal Science | 2020年 / 29卷
关键词
supercritical CO; cycle; absorption refrigeration cycle; sensible heat source; solar energy; thermodynamic analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The utilization of sensible waste heat such as flue gas and industrial surplus heat is essential for energy saving. Supercritical CO2 power generation cycle is a promising way to be used in this field. In this paper, a new supercritical CO2 Rankine cycle coupled with an absorption refrigeration cycle is proposed, which consists of a reheating supercritical CO2 cycle, a mixed-effect LiBr-H2O absorption refrigeration cycle and solar subsystem including evacuated-tube collector and a hot water storage tank. The system has four variants according to the presence or absence of solar subsystem and net cooling energy output. The thermodynamic model of the proposed system was established and its performance was evaluated. The proposed system is able to realize cascade utilization of flue gas waste heat and efficient conversion of solar energy. It has much higher thermodynamic efficiency than the reference system (i.e., the conventional supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle). Taking combined power and cooling system driven by flue gas waste heat and solar energy as an example, its thermal efficiency and exergy efficiency are 20.37% and 54.18% respectively, compared with the 14.74% and 35.96% of the reference system. Energy Utilization Diagrams (EUD) are implemented to investigate the irreversible losses and variation of the exergy destruction in the energy conversion process. Parametric analysis in two key parameters is conducted to provide guidance for the system optimal design.
引用
收藏
页码:1036 / 1052
页数:16
相关论文
共 86 条
[1]  
Cheang VT(2015)Benchmarking supercritical carbon dioxide cycles against steam Rankine cycles for Concentrated Solar Power Solar Energy 113 199-211
[2]  
Hedderwick RA(2015)Review and future trends of supercritical CO Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 48 434-451
[3]  
McGregor C(2010) Rankine cycle for low-grade heat conversion Applied Thermal Engineering 30 212-219
[4]  
Sarkar J(2015)Heat recovery from Diesel engines: A thermodynamic comparison between Kalina and ORC cycles Nuclear Engineering and Technology 47 647-661
[5]  
Bombarda P(2017)Review of supercritical CO Applied Thermal Engineering 125 799-810
[6]  
Invernizzi CM(2016) power cycle technology and current status of research and development Energy 103 758-771
[7]  
Pietra C(2009)Supercritical CO Applied Energy 86 1055-1063
[8]  
Ahn Y(2017) as heat transfer fluid: A review Applied Thermal Engineering 126 255-275
[9]  
Bae SJ(2012)Supercritical CO Energy 43 402-415
[10]  
Kim M(2014) Brayton cycles for coal-fired power plants Biomass and Bioenergy 69 155-168