Effect of endometrial preparation protocols on the risk of ectopic pregnancy for frozen embryo transfer

被引:0
作者
Seung Chik Jwa
Masashi Takamura
Akira Kuwahara
Takeshi Kajihara
Osamu Ishihara
机构
[1] Saitama Medical University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology
[2] Tokushima University,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences
来源
Scientific Reports | / 11卷
关键词
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Studies have consistently reported a significantly reduced incidence of ectopic pregnancy (EP) for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (ET) cycles compared with fresh cycles. However, only a few studies reported an association between endometrial preparation protocols on EP and results were conflicting. A registry-based retrospective cohort study of 153,354 clinical pregnancies following frozen single ETs between 2014 and 2017 were conducted, of which 792 cases of EP (0.52%) were reported. Blastocyst embryo transfers accounted for 87% of the total sample and were significantly associated with a decreased risk for EP compared with early cleavage ET (0.90% vs. 0.46%, adjusted OR = 0.50, 95% CI, 0.41 to 0.60). Compared with natural cycles, hormone replacement cycles (HRC) demonstrated a similar risk for EP (0.53% vs. 0.47%, adjusted OR = 1.12, 95% CI, 0.89 to 1.42). Subgroup analysis with or without tubal factor infertility and early cleavage/blastocyst ETs demonstrated similar non-significant associations. Endometrial preparation protocols using clomiphene (CC) were associated with a significantly increased risk for EP (1.12%, adjusted OR = 2.34; 95% CI, 1.38 to 3.98). These findings suggest that HRC and natural cycles had a similar risk for EP. Endometrial preparation using CC was associated with an increased risk of EP in frozen embryo transfer cycles.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 70 条
[1]  
Londra L(2016)Is the type of gonadotropin-releasing hormone suppression protocol for ovarian hyperstimulation associated with ectopic pregnancy in fresh autologous cycles for in vitro fertilization? Fertil. Steril. 106 666-672
[2]  
Moreau C(1999)Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy in assisted reproduction Fertil. Steril. 71 282-286
[3]  
Strobino D(2006)Ectopic pregnancy risk with assisted reproductive technology procedures Obstet. Gynecol. 107 595-604
[4]  
Bhasin A(2005)Ectopic pregnancy rate and treatment utilization in a large managed care organization Obstet. Gynecol. 105 1052-1057
[5]  
Zhao Y(2010)Trends in the diagnosis and treatment of ectopic pregnancy in the United States Obstet. Gynecol. 115 495-502
[6]  
Strandell A(2014)Ectopic pregnancy rates and racial disparities in the Medicaid population, 2004–2008 Fertil. Steril. 102 1671-1676
[7]  
Thorburn J(2015)Risk of ectopic pregnancy associated with assisted reproductive technology in the United States, 2001–2011 Obstet. Gynecol. 125 70-78
[8]  
Hamberger L(2004)Assisted hatching is associated with a higher ectopic pregnancy rate Fertil. Steril. 81 1701-1703
[9]  
Clayton HB(2017)Reduced ectopic pregnancy rate on day 5 embryo transfer compared with day 3: A meta-analysis PLoS ONE 12 e0169837-194
[10]  
Van Den Eeden SK(2003)Risk factors for ectopic pregnancy: A comprehensive analysis based on a large case-control, population-based study in France Am. J. Epidemiol. 157 185-139