The Action Research Paradigm: An Alternative Approach in Negotiation

被引:0
作者
Mesut Akdere
机构
[1] University of Minnesota,Department of Human Resource Development
来源
Systemic Practice and Action Research | 2003年 / 16卷
关键词
action research; negotiation; process; problem solving; decision making;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The action research model has been widely used by practitioners in many social science fields as a practical problem-solving method. Unique to the action research paradigm is that it allows research and practice to coexist and cowork simultaneously in problem solving. Due to increasingly complex relationships between governments, organizations, groups, and individuals, scholars and practitioners of negotiation are mandated to address and resolve different types of disputes by using various negotiation models and techniques to thoroughly understand and study the underlying foundations of these conflicts. This paper attempts to investigate the potential applications of the action research model as an appropriate tool for the negotiation as a process of dispute settlement.
引用
收藏
页码:339 / 354
页数:15
相关论文
共 15 条
  • [1] Downie B. M.(1991)When negotiations fails: Causes of breakdown and tactics for breaking the stalemate Negot. J. 7 175-186
  • [2] Fisher R.(1983)Negotiating power: Getting and using influence Am. Behav. Sci. 27 135-147
  • [3] Fisher R.(1985)Beyond yes Negot. J. 1 67-70
  • [4] Fox W. M.(1990)An interview with Eric Trist, father of the sociotechnical systems approach J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 26 259-279
  • [5] Haynes J. M.(1985)Matching readiness and willingness to the mediator's strategies Negot. J. 1 79-82
  • [6] Lewin K.(1946)Action research and minority problems J. Soc. Issues 2 34-46
  • [7] McCarthy W.(1985)The role of power and principle in getting to yes Negot. J. 1 59-66
  • [8] Murray J. S.(1986)Understanding competing theories of negotiation Negot. J. 6 179-187
  • [9] Peters M.(1984)The origins and status of action research J. Appl. Behav. Sci. 20 113-124
  • [10] Robinson V.(1983)Mediation of conflicts Am. Behav. Sci. 27 195-210