Can breast MRI help in the management of women with breast cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy?

被引:0
作者
R M L Warren
L G Bobrow
H M Earl
P D Britton
D Gopalan
A D Purushotham
G C Wishart
J R Benson
W Hollingworth
机构
[1] Cambridge Breast Unit,Department of Radiology
[2] Addenbrooke's Hospital,Department of Histopathology
[3] Cambridge Breast Unit,Department of Medical Oncology
[4] Addenbrooke's Hospital,Department of Surgery
[5] Cambridge Breast Unit,Department of Radiology
[6] Addenbrooke's Hospital,undefined
[7] Cambridge Breast Unit,undefined
[8] Addenbrooke's Hospital,undefined
[9] University of Washington,undefined
来源
British Journal of Cancer | 2004年 / 90卷
关键词
breast cancer; breast MRI; disease response; diagnostic impact; neoadjuvant chemotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI was used to monitor breast cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients underwent CE MRI before and after therapy, together with conventional assessment methods (CAM). CE MRI was carried out at 1.5 T in the coronal plain with 3D sequences before and after bolus injection. An expert panel determined chemotherapy response using both CE MRI and CAM. Histopathological response in the surgical specimen was then used to determine the sensitivity and specificity of CE MRI and CAM. In total, 67 patients with 69 breast cancers were studied (mean age of 46 years). Tumour characteristics showed a high-risk tumour population: median size 49 mm: histopathological grade 3 (55%): oestrogen receptor (ER) negative (48%). Histopathological response was as follows: – complete pathological response (pCR) 17%; partial response (pPR) 68%; no response (NR) 15%. Sensitivity of CAM for pCR or pPR was 98% (CI 91–100%) and specificity was 50% (CI 19–81%). CE MRI sensitivity was 100% (CI 94–100%), and specificity was 80% (CI 44–97%). The absolute agreement between assessment methods and histopathology was marginally higher for CE MRI than CAM (81 vs 68%; P=0.09). In 71%, CE MRI increased diagnostic knowledge, although in 20% it was judged confusing or incorrect. The 2nd MRI study significantly increased diagnostic confidence, and in 19% could have changed the treatment plan. CE MRI persistently underestimated minimal residual disease. In conclusion, CE MRI of breast cancer proved more reliable for predicting histopathological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy than conventional assessment methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1349 / 1360
页数:11
相关论文
共 326 条
[1]  
Abraham DC(1996)Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapeutic response of locally advanced breast cancer by magnetic resonance imaging Cancer 78 91-100
[2]  
Jones RC(2002)Scarff–Bloom–Richardson (SBR) grading: a pleiotropic marker of chemosensitivity in invasive ductal breast carcinomas treated by neoadjuvant chemotherapy Int J Oncol 20 791-796
[3]  
Jones SE(2002)Imaging in evaluation of response to neoadjuvant breast cancer treatment benefits of MRI Breast Cancer Res Treat 72 145-152
[4]  
Cheek JH(1997)Magnetic resonance imaging or arthrography of the shoulder: which do patients prefer? Br J Radiol 70 786-790
[5]  
Peters GN(2000)Magnetic resonance imaging screening in women at genetic risk of breast cancer: imaging and analysis protocol for the UK multicentre study [In Process Citation] Magn Reson Imaging 18 765-776
[6]  
Knox SM(2003)Monitoring the size and response of locally advanced breast cancers to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel and epirubicin) with serial enhanced MRI Breast Cancer Res Treat 78 51-58
[7]  
Grant MD(2002)Prognostic significance of a complete pathological response after induction chemotherapy in operable breast cancer Br J Cancer 86 1041-1046
[8]  
Hampe DW(1996)Breast cancer measurements with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasonography, and mammography Breast Cancer Res Treat 37 1-9
[9]  
Savino DA(2003)Invasive ductal breast carcinoma response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy: noninvasive monitoring with functional MR imaging – pilot study Radiology 228 63-69
[10]  
Harms SE(2001)Evaluation of response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced breast cancer with dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast Eur J Surg Oncol 27 617-620