Coherence objectivity and measurement: the example of democracy

被引:0
作者
Sharon Crasnow
机构
[1] Norco College,
来源
Synthese | 2021年 / 199卷
关键词
Democracy; Measurement; Objectivity; Coherence; Values in science; Political science;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Empirical research on democracy depends upon data. The need for such data has led to the development of measures of democracy. Measurement models are evaluated in terms of their reliability and validity, both of which may be thought of as related to the objectivity of the measure. Using the Varieties of Democracy Project (V-Dem) as an example, I consider how assessing reliability and validity of measurement models is challenging and argue that democracy might be understood as measured objectively when it is subject to theoretical, empirical, and pragmatic constraints. I call this coherence objectivity.
引用
收藏
页码:1207 / 1229
页数:22
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Adcock R(2001)Measurement validity: A shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research American Political Science Review 95 529-546
[2]  
Collier D(2018)Realism for realistic people Spontaneous Generations 9 31-34
[3]  
Chang H(1997)Democracy with adjectives World Politics 49 430-451
[4]  
Collier D(2000)How natural can ontology be? Philosophy of Science 67 114-132
[5]  
Levitsky S(2002)Thinking about hybrid regimes Journal of Democracy 13 21-35
[6]  
Crasnow S(2004)The irreducible complexity of objectivity Synthese 138 453-473
[7]  
Diamond L(1995)Objectivity and the double standard for feminist epistemologies Synthese 104 351-381
[8]  
Douglas HE(2015)The battle of ideas and discourses before democratic transition: Different democratic conceptions in authoritarian China International Political Science Review 36 20-41
[9]  
Lloyd E(2000)Women’s suffrage and the measurement of democracy: Problems of operationalization Studies in Comparative International Development 43 92-111
[10]  
Lu J(2018)Perceptions and conceptions of democracy: Applying thick concepts of democracy to reassess desires for democracy Comparative Political Studies 51 1387-1440