Ecotoxicological Effects of an Arsenic Remediation Method on Three Freshwater Organisms—Lemna disperma, Chlorella sp. CE-35 and Ceriodaphnia cf. dubia

被引:0
作者
M. Azizur Rahman
Ben Hogan
Elliott Duncan
Christopher Doyle
Mohammad Mahmudur Rahman
T. V. Nguyen
Richard P. Lim
William Maher
Ravi Naidu
Rick Krassoi
S. Vigneswaran
Christel Hassler
机构
[1] University of Technology Sydney,Centre for Environmental Sustainability, School of the Environment
[2] University of Canberra,Ecochemistry Laboratory, Institute for Applied Ecology
[3] Ecotox Services Australasia Pty. Ltd.,Global Centre for Environmental Remediation (GCER), Faculty of Science & Information Technology
[4] University of Newcastle,Faculty of Engineering and IT
[5] Cooperative Research Centre for Contamination Assessment and Remediation of the Environment (CRC-CARE),Institute F. A. Forel
[6] University of Technology Sydney,undefined
[7] University of Geneva,undefined
来源
Water, Air, & Soil Pollution | 2015年 / 226卷
关键词
Arsenic; Fe-oxide-coated sand (IOCS); Remediation; Ecotoxicological effect; Freshwater organisms;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chemical methods have been used for the remediation of arsenic (As)-contaminated water; however, ecological consequences of these methods have not been properly addressed. The present study evaluated the effects of the Fe-oxide-coated sand (IOCS) remediation method on As toxicity to freshwater organisms (Lemna disperma, Chlorella sp. CE-35, and Ceriodaphnia cf. dubia). The As removal efficiency by IOCS decreased substantially with time. The IOCS remediation method was less effective at suppressing the toxicity of AsV than AsIII to L. disperma but was highly effective in reducing both the AsIII and AsV toxicity to C. cf. dubia. The growth of Chlorella sp. was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in remediated and pre-remediated water than in controls (non-As-contaminated filtered Colo River water) for AsIII, while the opposite was observed for AsV, indicating that AsV is more toxic than AsIII to this microalga. Although the IOCS can efficiently remove As from contaminated water, residual As and other constituents (e.g. Fe, nitrate) in the remediated water had a significant effect on freshwater organisms.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 115 条
[1]  
Abdul JM(2012)Use of duckweed ( Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 83 89-95
[2]  
Colville A(2003)) to assess the phytotoxicity of the products of Fenton oxidation of metsulfuron methyl Journal of Geochemical Exploration 77 109-131
[3]  
Lim R(1999)Geochemical occurrence of arsenic in groundwater of Bangladesh: sources and mobilization processes Australian Journal of Earth Sciences 46 861-874
[4]  
Vigneswaran S(2011)Arsenic contamination at the mole river mine, northern New South Wales Science 332 1149-1993
[5]  
Kandasamy J(2010)Comment on “A bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 29 1984-57
[6]  
Anawar HM(1998)Toxicity of brominated volatile organics to freshwater biota Australian Geographical Studies 36 37-20854
[7]  
Akai J(2010)The environmental status of Hawkesbury river sediments Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107 20853-5802
[8]  
Komaki K(2010)Arsenic tolerance in plants: “Pas de deux” between phytochelatin synthesis and ABCC vacuolar transporters Water Research 44 5789-2378
[9]  
Terao H(2011)Status of groundwater arsenic contamination in Bangladesh: A 14-year study report Science 332 1149-1690
[10]  
Yoshioka T(2001)Comment on “a bacterium that can grow by using arsenic instead of phosphorus” Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 65 2361-2639