Effective adsorption of A-series chemical warfare agents on graphdiyne nanoflake: a DFT study

被引:0
作者
Hasnain Sajid
Sidra Khan
Khurshid Ayub
Tariq Mahmood
机构
[1] COMSATS University,Department of Chemistry
来源
Journal of Molecular Modeling | 2021年 / 27卷
关键词
Graphdiyne nanoflake; Chemical warfare agents; DFT; QTAIM; SAPT; RDG;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chemical warfare agents (CWAs) are highly poisonous and their presence may cause diverse effects not only on living organisms but also on environment. Therefore, their detection and removal in a short time span is very important. In this regard, here the utility of graphdiyne (GDY) nanoflake is studied theoretically as an electrochemical sensor material for the hazardous CWAs including A-230, A-232, and A-234. Herein, we explain the phenomenon of adsorption of A-series CWAs on GDY nanoflake within the density functional theory (DFT) framework. The characterisation of adsorption is based on optimised geometries, BSSE-corrected energies, SAPT0, RDG, FMO, CHELPG charge transfer, QTAIM and UV-Vis analyses. The calculated counterpoise adsorption energies for reported complexes range from − 13.70 to − 17.19 kcal mol−1. These adsorption energies show that analytes are physiosorbed onto GDY which usually takes place through noncovalent interactions. The noncovalent adsorption of CWAs on GDY is also attributed by the SAPT0, RDG and QTAIM analyses. These properties also reveal that dispersion factors dominate in the complexes among many noncovalent components (exchange, induction, electrostatic, steric and repulsion). In order to estimate the sensitivity of GDY, the %sensitivity and average energy gap variations are quantitatively measured by energies of HOMO and LUMO orbitals. In terms of adsorption affinity of GDY, UV-Vis analysis, CHELPG charge transfer and DOS analyses depict an appreciable response towards these toxic CWAs.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 196 条
[1]  
Kim K(2011)Destruction and detection of chemical warfare agents Chem Rev 111 5345-5403
[2]  
Tsay OG(2005)Indoor sorption of surrogates for Sarin and related nerve agents Environ Sci Technol 39 3203-3214
[3]  
Atwood DA(2002)Critical evaluation of proven chemical weapon destruction technologies (IUPAC Technical Report) Pure Appl Chem 74 187-316
[4]  
Churchill DG(2016)Sea-dumped chemical weapons: environmental risk, occupational hazard Clin Toxicol 54 79-91
[5]  
Singer BC(2010)Advances in the chemical sensors for the detection of DMMP — a simulant for nerve agent sarin Procedia Eng 7 179-184
[6]  
Hodgson AT(2017)Adsorption of phosgene molecule on the transition metal-doped graphene: first principles calculations Appl Surf Sci 425 340-350
[7]  
Destaillats H(2008)Chemical warfare agents Environ Toxicol Pharmacol 26 113-122
[8]  
Pearson GS(2019)Theoretical study of the molecular aspect of the suspected novichok agent A234 of the Skripal poisoning R Soc Open Sci 6 181831-48
[9]  
Magee RS(2018)Novichok agents: a historical, current, and toxicological perspective Toxicol Commun 2 45-539
[10]  
Greenberg MI(2010)State secrets: an insider’s chronicle of the Russian Chemical Weapons Program, by S. Vil Mirzayanov J Slav Mil Stud 23 537-305