Efficacy of chitosan dressing on endoscopic sinus surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:0
作者
Jing-chun Zhou
Jing-jing Zhang
Wei Zhang
Zhao-yang Ke
Bo Zhang
机构
[1] The Second Clinical Medical College of Jinan University,Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Shenzhen People’s Hospital
[2] Peking University Shenzhen Hospital,Department of Otorhinolaryngology
来源
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology | 2017年 / 274卷
关键词
Chitosan dressing; Synechia; Hemostasis; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Meta-analysis;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Chitosan dressing might be promising to promote the recovery following endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS). However, the results remain controversial. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of chitosan dressing on ESS. PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assessing the effect of chitosan dressing on endoscopic sinus surgery were included. Two investigators independently searched articles, extracted data, and assessed the quality of included studies. The primary outcomes were synechia and hemostasis. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effect model. Four RCTs involving 268 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Overall following ESS, compared with control intervention, chitosan dressing significantly reduced synechia (RR = 0.25; 95% CI 0.13–0.49; P < 0.0001) and promoted hemostasis (RR = 1.70; 95% CI 1.37–2.11; P < 0.00001), but showed no impact on granulations (RR = 1.18; 95% CI 0.72–1.95; P = 0.52), mucosal edema (RR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.60–1.29; P = 0.51), crusting (RR = 0.85; 95% CI 0.48–1.53; P = 0.60), and infection (RR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.51–1.52; P = 0.64). Compared to control intervention, chitosan dressing could significantly decrease edema and improve hemostasis, but had no effect on granulations, mucosal edema, crusting and infection.
引用
收藏
页码:3269 / 3274
页数:5
相关论文
共 150 条
  • [1] Lazar RH(1993)Functional endonasal sinus surgery in adults and children Laryngoscope 103 1-5
  • [2] Younis RT(2017)Prevalence of polyp recurrence after endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis Laryngoscope 127 550-555
  • [3] Long TE(2016)Productivity outcomes following endoscopic sinus surgery for recurrent acute rhinosinusitis Laryngoscope 126 1046-1053
  • [4] DeConde AS(2016)Product comparison model in otolaryngology: equivalency analysis of absorbable hemostatic agents after endoscopic sinus surgery Laryngoscope 126 S5-S13
  • [5] Mace JC(2017)Postoperative care in endoscopic sinus surgery: a critical review Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 25 35-42
  • [6] Levy JM(2017)Factors influencing the need for endoscopic sinus surgery in adult patients with cystic fibrosis Am J Rhinol Allergy 31 44-47
  • [7] Rudmik L(2016)Effect of a chitosan gel on hemostasis and prevention of adhesion after endoscopic sinus surgery Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 9 143-149
  • [8] Alt JA(1994)Complications of endoscopic sinus surgery: analysis of 2108 patients—incidence and prevention Laryngoscope 104 1080-1083
  • [9] Smith TL(1988)Intranasal adhesion formation following surgery for chronic nasal obstruction Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 13 139-143
  • [10] Steele TO(2006)Effects of nonabsorbable packing in middle meatus after sinus surgery Laryngoscope 116 83-88