Three-dimensional mean stone density on non-contrast computed tomography can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in ureteral stone cases

被引:0
作者
Shimpei Yamashita
Yuya Iwahashi
Ryusuke Deguchi
Kazuro Kikkawa
Yasuo Kohjimoto
Isao Hara
机构
[1] Wakayama Medical University,Department of Urology
来源
Urolithiasis | 2020年 / 48卷
关键词
Mean stone density; Ureteroscopy; Lithotripsy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The association between mean stone density (MSD) and ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome remains controversial. MSD automatically measured by 3D images of stones (3D-MSD) was recently reported to be more useful than manual measuring methods for predicting outcomes of shock-wave lithotripsy. This study aims to investigate whether 3D-MSD can predict ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome. We retrospectively identified 218 patients who underwent ureteroscopic lithotripsy for kidney stones (n = 135) and ureteral stones (n = 83) between February 2011 and April 2017 with pretreatment non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) at our hospital. Stone volume and 3D-MSD were automatically measured using high functional viewer. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors contributing to treatment failure. Treatment failure was determined as residual fragments ≥ 4 mm using NCCT within 3 months after operation. Treatment failure rate was 20.1% (44/218 cases). Patients in treatment failure group had higher percentage of kidney stones (< 0.01) and multiple stones (p < 0.01), larger stone volume (p < 0.01) and higher 3D-MSD (p < 0.01). Multivariate analysis revealed that stone location (p < 0.01), stone number (p < 0.01), stone volume (p = 0.02) and 3D-MSD (p = 0.02) independently predicted the outcome. Categorized by stone location, 3D-MSD was the only significant independent predictor in cases of ureteral stones (p < 0.01), but was not significant in cases of kidney stones. 3D-MSD is useful for predicting ureteroscopic lithotripsy outcome in cases of ureteral stones.
引用
收藏
页码:547 / 552
页数:5
相关论文
共 109 条
[1]  
Assimos D(2016)Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART II J Urol 196 1161-1169
[2]  
Krambeck A(2016)Surgical management of stones: American Urological Association/Endourological Society Guideline. PART I J Urol 196 1153-1160
[3]  
Miller NL(2015)Guideline of guidelines: kidney stones BJU Int 116 184-189
[4]  
Monga M(2015)Outcomes of flexible ureterorenoscopy for solitary renal stones in the CROES URS global study J Urol 194 137-143
[5]  
Murad MH(2015)A prospective, multi-institutional study of flexible ureteroscopy for proximal ureteral stones smaller than 2 cm J Urol 193 165-169
[6]  
Nelson CP(2009)Development of a scoring system from noncontrast computerized tomography measurements to improve the selection of upper ureteral stone for extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy J Urol 181 1151-1157
[7]  
Pace KT(2007)Shock wave lithotripsy correlates with stone density on preoperative computerized tomography J Urol 178 912-915
[8]  
Pais VM(2019)Three-dimensional mean stone density measurement is superior for predicting extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy success Int J Urol 26 185-191
[9]  
Pearle MS(2014)Usefulness of hounsfield unit and density in the assessment and treatment of urinary stones World J Nephrol 3 282-286
[10]  
Preminger GM(2008)Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy Urology 72 765-769