Decision making for material selection using the UTA method

被引:0
作者
Vijay Manikrao Athawale
Rajanikar Kumar
Shankar Chakraborty
机构
[1] Government Polytechnic,Department of Mechanical Engineering
[2] Jadavpur University,Department of Production Engineering
来源
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology | 2011年 / 57卷
关键词
Material selection; Multi-criteria decision-making; Utility additive method; Utility value;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The choice of materials plays an important role in the decision-making process of the manufacturing organizations. The materials affect many aspects of a product and the manufacturing process too. The improper selection of material can result in a defective final product. Thus, if satisfactory results are to be expected, immense importance must be given for proper selection of the materials. There are numerous choices and various criteria influencing the selection of material for a particular application. These criteria range from mechanical, electrical, and physical properties to corrosion resistance and economic considerations of the materials. The large number of available materials, together with the complex relationships between various selection parameters, often makes the selection process a difficult task. The problem of selecting a material for an engineering application from among two or more alternatives on the basis of several criteria can be treated as a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) problem. This paper mainly focuses on solving two real-time material selection problems using utility additive (UTA) method, which is an almost unexplored MCDM tool to solve such type of complex decision-making problems. It is observed that the ranking performance of the UTA method is quite comparable with the other MCDM methods as adopted by the past researchers.
引用
收藏
页码:11 / 22
页数:11
相关论文
共 91 条
[1]  
Edwards KL(2005)Selecting materials for optimum use in engineering components Mater Des 26 469-472
[2]  
Deng Y-M(2007)The role of materials identification and selection in engineering design Mater Des 28 131-139
[3]  
Edwards KL(2000)A method for optimal material selection aided with decision making theory Mater Des 21 199-206
[4]  
Jee D-H(2009)A simplified fuzzy logic approach for materials selection in mechanical engineering design Mater Des 30 687-697
[5]  
Kang K-J(2006)TOPSIS multiple-criteria decision support analysis for material selection of metallic bipolar plates for polymer electrolyte fuel cell J Power Sources 159 1095-1104
[6]  
Khabbaz RS(2009)A methodological concept for material selection of highly sensitive components based on multiple criteria decision analysis Expert Syst Appl 36 1362-1370
[7]  
Manshadi BD(2006)A material selection model using graph theory and matrix approach Mater Sc and Engg A 431 248-255
[8]  
Abedian A(2008)A decision making methodology for material selection using an improved compromise ranking method Mater Des 29 1949-1954
[9]  
Mahmudi R(2007)Multi-criteria material selections and end-of-life product strategy: grey relational analysis approach Mater Des 28 1539-1546
[10]  
Shanian A(2007)A novel method for materials selection in mechanical design: combination of non-linear linearization and a modified digital logic method Mater Des 28 8-15