Model-based inference on average causal effect in observational clustered data

被引:0
作者
Meng Wu
Recai M. Yucel
机构
[1] University at Albany,Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics
[2] SUNY,Office of Quality and Patient Safety
[3] New York State Department of Health,School of Public Health
[4] State University of New York at Albany,undefined
来源
Health Services and Outcomes Research Methodology | 2019年 / 19卷
关键词
ACE; Causal inference; Clustered data; Dual-modeling; Linear mixed-effects model; Potential outcomes; Sandwich estimator;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
We study causal inference using the framework of potential outcomes in clustered data settings where observational units are clustered in naturally occurring groups (e.g. patients within hospitals). To incorporate the correlated nature of the data, we employ mixed-effects models and a sandwich estimator to make inferences on the average causal effect (ACE). Our methods apply the concept of potential outcomes from the Rubin Causal Model (Holland in J Am Stat Assoc 81(396):945–960, 1986), and extend Schafer and Kang’s methods of estimating the variance of the ACE (Schafer and Kang in Psychol Methods 13(4):279–313, 2008). Particularly, we develop two model-based approaches to estimate the ACE and its variance under a dual-modeling strategy which adjusts for the confounding effect through inverse probability weighting. These two approaches use linear mixed-effects models for the estimation of potential outcomes, but differ in how clustering is handled in the treatment assignment model. We present a summary of our comprehensive simulation study assessing the repetitive sampling properties of the two approaches in a pseudo-random simulation environment. Finally, we report our findings from an application to study the ACE of inadequate prenatal care on birth weight among low-income women in New York State.
引用
收藏
页码:36 / 60
页数:24
相关论文
共 133 条
  • [41] Ten Have TR(1974)Estimating causal effects of treatments in randomized and nonrandomized studies J. Educ. Psychol. 66 688-701
  • [42] Gitelman AI(1990)On the application of probability theory to agricultural experiments. Essay on principles. Section 9 Stat. Sci. 5 472-480
  • [43] Gruber S(2001)Using propensity scores to help design observational studies: application to the tobacco litigation Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 2 169-188
  • [44] Van Der Laan MJ(2004)On principles for modeling propensity scores in medical research Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 13 855-857
  • [45] Gruber JS(2005)Causal inference using potential outcomes: design, modeling, decisions J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100 322-331
  • [46] Amold BF(2008)Average causal effects from nonrandomized studies: a practical guide and simulated example Psychol. Methods 13 279-313
  • [47] Reyqadas F(2016)Variable selection for confounder control, flexible modeling and collaborative targeted minimum loss-based estimation in causal inference Int. J. Biostat. 12 97-115
  • [48] Hubbard AE(1987)Prenatal care adequacy and the outcome of adolescent pregnancy: effects on weight gain, preterm delivery, and birth weight Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 69 312-316
  • [49] Colford JM(2013)Review of inverse probability weighting for dealing with missing data Stat. Methods Med. Res. 22 278-295
  • [50] Hernán MA(2009)Relaxing latent ignorability in the ITT analysis of randomized studies with missing data and noncompliance Stat. Sin. 19 749-764