An audit of prophylactic surgical antibiotic use in a Sudanese Teaching Hospital

被引:0
作者
Abubaker Ibrahim Elbur
Mirghani Abd El Rahman Yousif
Ahmed Sayed Ahmed ElSayed
Manar Elsheikh Abdel-Rahman
机构
[1] Taif University,Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy
[2] Alshaab Teaching Hospital,Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery
[3] University of Khartoum,Faculty of Mathematical Sciences
来源
International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy | 2013年 / 35卷
关键词
Antibiotic prophylaxis; Drug utilization review; Sudan; Surgery; Surgical wound infection;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background Antibiotic prophylaxis is effective at reducing the risk of postoperative infection for nearly all types of surgery. Objective To audit the use of prophylactic antibiotics for elective surgery. Setting Khartoum Teaching Hospital, Sudan, a 1,000 bed tertiary level hospital. Method A prospective study was conducted over a 9 month period; patients admitted for elective surgery were included consecutively. Main outcome measure The use and administration of prophylactic antibiotics for elective surgery. Results A total of 1,768 patients with mean age 37.8 ± 14 years were recruited (females, 83.3 % of total) who underwent 1,814 surgical interventions. Of these 1,277 (70.4 %) of procedures were clean-contaminated. A total of 1,758 patients (99.4 % of total) received antibiotics for prophylaxis; 1,730 patients (97.9 %) were given antibiotics in the operating room; for 1,288 (74.5 %) of cases the antibiotics were considered ‘recommended’, while for 442 (25.5 %) they were not. Out of the patients for whom prophylaxis was recommended and was given, 725 (56.3 %) of patients received a broad spectrum antibiotic or unnecessary combination, 913 (70.9 %) received a sub-therapeutic dose, 120 (9.3 %) were given the first preoperative dose within the proper time window, and 1,250 (97 %) of patients had an extended duration of prophylaxis. Compliance with all stated criteria was achieved in only 47 (2.7 %) of observed prescriptions. Conclusion This audit showed a wide gap between international standards and local practices; the authors call for urgent action to correct this situation through the development and implementation of local clinical guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:149 / 153
页数:4
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
Hampson FG(2005)Prophylactic antibiotics in surgery Surgery 23 290-293
[2]  
Ridgway EJ(1999)Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 20 250-278
[3]  
Mangram AJ(2001)Preventing surgical site infections: a surgeon’s perspective Emerg Infect Dis 7 220-224
[4]  
Horan TC(2006)Implementing 1-dose antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of surgical site infection Arch Surg 141 1109-1113
[5]  
Pearson ML(2004)Surgical Infection Prevention Guidelines Writers Workgroup. Antimicrobial prophylaxis for surgery: an advisory statement from the National Surgical Infection Prevention Project Clin Infect Dis 38 1706-1715
[6]  
Silver LC(1999)ASHP therapeutic guidelines on antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery Am J Health Syst Pharm 56 1839-1888
[7]  
Jarvis WR(2011)Evaluation of prophylactic antibiotic administration at the surgical ward of a major referral hospital, Islamic Republic of Iran East Mediterr Health J. 17 663-668
[8]  
Nicolas RL(1990)Review of the pharmacology; pharmacokinentics and clinical use of cephalosporin Tex Heart Inst J 17 203-215
[9]  
Fonseca SN(1998)Quality of perioperative antibiotic administration by French anesthetists J Hosp Infect 40 47-53
[10]  
Kunzle SR(2008)Guidelines for implementation of clinical studies on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis J Infect Chemother 14 172-177