Early experience of MAGEC magnetic growing rods in the treatment of early onset scoliosis

被引:100
作者
Hickey B.A. [1 ]
Towriss C. [1 ]
Baxter G. [1 ]
Yasso S. [1 ]
James S. [1 ]
Jones A. [1 ]
Howes J. [1 ]
Davies P. [1 ]
Ahuja S. [1 ]
机构
[1] Trauma and Orthopaedics, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Heath Park
关键词
Early onset scoliosis; Growing rod; Magnetic rod; MCGR;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-013-3163-0
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Magnetically controlled growing rod systems have been introduced over recent years as an alternative to traditional growing rods for management of early onset scoliosis. The purpose of this paper is to report our early experience of a magnetically controlled growing rod system (MAGEC, Ellipse). Methods: Review of pre-operative, postoperative and follow-up Cobb angles and spinal growth in case series of eight patients with a minimum 23 months' follow-up (23-36 months). Results: A total of six patients had dual rod constructs implanted and two patients received single-rod constructs. Four patients had MAGEC rods as a primary procedure. Four were revisions from other systems. Mean age at surgery in the primary group was 4.5 years (range 3.9-6.9). In patients who had MAGEC as a primary procedure, mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 74° (63-94), with postoperative Cobb angle of 42° (32-56) p & 0.001 (43 % correction). Mean Cobb angle at follow-up was 42° (35-50). Spinal growth rate was 6 mm/year. One sustained proximal screw pull out. A final patient sustained a rod fracture. Mean age at surgery in the revision group was 10.9 years (range 9-12.6). Mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 45° (34-69). Postoperative Cobb angle was 42° (33-63) (2 % correction). Mean Cobb angle at follow-up was 44° (28-67). Mean spinal growth rate was 12 mm/year. Two patients developed loss of distraction. Conclusion: MAGEC growing rod system effectively controls early onset scoliosis when used as either a primary or revision procedure. Although implant-related complications are not uncommon, the avoidance of multiple surgeries following implantation is beneficial compared with traditional growing rod systems. © 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
引用
收藏
页码:S61 / S65
页数:4
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
Akbarnia B.A., Et al., Dual growing rod technique followed for three to eleven years until final fusion: The effect of frequency of lengthening, Spine, 33, 9, pp. 984-990, (2008)
[2]  
Akbarnia B.A., Et al., Dual growing rod technique for the treatment of progressive early onset scoliosis: A multicenter study, Spine, 30, 17 SUPPL., (2005)
[3]  
Akbarnia B.A., Et al., Next generation of growth-sparing techniques, Spine, 38, 8, pp. 665-670, (2013)
[4]  
Bess S., Et al., Complications of growing-rod treatment for early onset scoliosis: Analysis of one hundred and forty patients, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 92, 15, pp. 2533-2543, (2010)
[5]  
Caldas J.C., Pais-Ribeiro J.L., Carneiro S.R., General anaesthesia, surgery and hospitalization in children and their effects upon cognitive, academic, emotional and socio behavioural development - A review, Paediatr Anaesth, 14, pp. 910-915, (2004)
[6]  
Cobb J.R., The problem of the primary curve, J Bone Joint Surg Am, 42, pp. 1413-1425, (1960)
[7]  
Cheung K., Et al., Magnetically controlled growing rods for severe spinal curvature in young children: A prospective case series, Lancet, 379, 9830, pp. 1967-1974, (2012)
[8]  
Dannawi Z., Early results of a remotely-operated magnetic growth rod in early onset scoliosis, Bone Joint J, 95, 1, pp. 75-80, (2013)
[9]  
Dimeglio A., Canavese F., The growing spine: How spinal deformities influence normal spine and thoracic cage growth, Eur Spine J, 21, 1, pp. 64-70, (2011)
[10]  
Kain Z.N., Wang S.M., Mayes L.C., Caramico L.A., Hofstadter M.B., Distress during the induction of anaesthesia and postoperative behavioural outcomes, Anesth Analg, 88, pp. 1042-1047, (1999)