How attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing

被引:0
作者
Nicolas Vuillerme
Gilel Nafati
机构
[1] Université de Savoie,Laboratoire de Modélisation des Activités Sportives
[2] UMR CNRS 5525,Laboratoire TIMC
[3] Equipe AFIRM,IMAG
[4] UMR 6196,Laboratoire de Plasticité et PhysioPathologie de la Motricité
[5] CNRS/Université de la Méditerranée,undefined
来源
Psychological Research | 2007年 / 71卷
关键词
Postural Control; Attentional Focus; Attention Condition; Postural Task; Quiet Standing;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
The purpose of this study was to investigate how attentional focus on body sway affects postural control during quiet standing. To address this issue, sixteen young healthy adults were asked to stand upright as immobile as possible on a force platform in both Control and Attention conditions. In the latter condition, participants were instructed to deliberately focus their attention on their body sways and to increase their active intervention into postural control. The critical analysis was focused on elementary motions computed from the centre of pressure (CoP) trajectories: (1) the vertical projection of the centre of gravity (CoGv) and (2) the difference between CoP and CoGv (CoP–CoGv). The former is recognised as an index of performance in this postural task, whilst the latter constitutes a fair expression of the ankle joint stiffness and is linked to the level of neuromuscular activity of the lower limb muscles required for controlling posture. A frequency-domain analysis showed increased amplitudes and frequencies of CoP–CoGv motions in the Attention relative to the Control condition, whereas non-significant changes were observed for the CoGv motions. Altogether, the present findings suggest that attentional focus on body sway, induced by the instructions, promoted the use of less automatic control process and hampered the efficiency for controlling posture during quiet standing.
引用
收藏
页码:192 / 200
页数:8
相关论文
共 103 条
  • [1] Abernethy B.(1988)Dual-task methodology and motor skills research: Some methodological constraints Journal of Human Movement Studies 14 101-132
  • [2] Baumeister R. F.(1984)Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46 610-620
  • [3] Beilock S. L.(2001)On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 130 701-725
  • [4] Carr T. H.(1997)Mental simulation of an action modulates the excitability of spinal reflex pathways in man Cognitive Brain Research 5 221-228
  • [5] Bonnet M.(1996)Why we walk the way we do Journal of Motor Behavior 28 291-298
  • [6] Decety J.(1989)The effects of voluntary contraction on the H-reflex of human limb muscles Brain 112 417-493
  • [7] Jeannerod M.(1987)Difference in the amplitude of the human soleus H reflex during walking and running Journal of Physiology (London) 392 513-522
  • [8] Requin J.(1997)Estimating the center of gravity of the body on the basis of the center of pressure in standing posture Journal of Biomechanics 30 1169-1171
  • [9] Breniere Y.(2000)A comparative analysis of the center of gravity and center of pressure trajectory path lengths in standing posture: An estimation of active stiffness. Journal of Applied Biomechanics 16 234-247
  • [10] Burke D.(2001)The influence of postural threat on the control of upright stance. Experimental Brain Research 138 210-218