Seismic analysis, design, and retrofit of built-environments: a procedural review of current practices and case studies

被引：0

作者：

Kim J.-H. ^{[1
]}

Hessek C.J. ^{[2
]}

Kim Y.J. ^{[1
]}

Park H.-G. ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Department of Civil Engineering, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, CO

[2] Fortis Structural, LLC, Greenwood Village, CO

[3] Department of Architecture and Architectural Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul

来源：

Journal of Infrastructure Preservation and Resilience | / 3卷 / 1期

关键词：

Practice; Retrofit; Review; Seismic analysis; Standards; Strengthening;

D O I：

10.1186/s43065-022-00056-3

中图分类号：

学科分类号：

摘要：

This paper presents a synthesis of current practices in regard to the seismic analysis, design, and retrofit of built-environments. Background information on the behavior of existing buildings subjected to earthquake loadings is gathered and rehabilitation methodologies are elaborated. The first part of the review examines design standards and guidelines that are used in the structural engineering community. These documents are mandatory for the legal adoption of a model code by the governing jurisdiction where the building in question is to be located. The second part discusses retrofit procedures alongside specific provisions dominating the requirements and techniques appertaining to ground motions. The third part handles case studies emphasizing an upgrade of school buildings that are non-conforming to contemporary specifications and guidelines. For substantiating the performance of proposed methodologies, laboratory tests are conducted in conjunction with finite element analysis, which form the technical foundation of site implementations. © The Author(s) 2022.

引用

共 24 条

[1]

Kappos A., Penelis G.G., Earthquake resistant concrete structures, (2014)

[2]

Seismic evaluation guidance: screening, prioritization and implementation details (SPID) for the resolution of Fukushima near-term task force recommendation 2.1: Seismic, Electric Power Research Institute, Report No, 1025287, (2012)

[3]

Pohoryles D.A., Bournas D.A., Seismic retrofit of infilled RC frames with textile reinforced mortars: State-of-the-art review and analytical modelling, Composites Part B, 183, (2020)

[4]

Fung J.F., Sattar S., Butry D.T., McCabe S.L., The total costs of seismic retrofits: state of the art, Earthquake Spectra, in-press, (2021)

[5]

Nigam P.K., Akhtar S., Retrofitting practices in various categories of RCC structures: A comprehensive review, Materialstoday: Proceedings, 45, 7, pp. 7123-7131, (2021)

[6]

Attard T.L., Abela C.M., Dhiradhamvit K., Seismic FRP retrofit of circular single-column bents using a ductility wrap envelope to alter failure modes, Eng Struct, 33, pp. 1553-1564, (2011)

[7]

Lignos D.G., Moreno D.M., Billington S.L., Seismic retrofit of steel moment-resisting frames with high-performance fiber-reinforced concrete infill panels: large-scale hybrid simulation experiments, J Struct Eng, 140, 3, (2014)

[8]

Zafar A., Andrawes B., Seismic behavior of SMA-FRP reinforced concrete frames under sequential seismic hazard, Eng Struct, 98, pp. 163-173, (2015)

[9]

Caterino N., Nuzzo I., Ianniello A., Varchetta G., Cosenza E., A BIM-based decision-making framework for optimal seismic retrofit of existing buildings, Eng Struct, 242, (2021)

[10]

Gara F., Carbonari S., Roia D., Balducci A., Dezi L., Seismic retrofit assessment of a school building through operational modal analysis and f.e. modeling, J Structural Eng, 147, 1, (2021)

← 1 2 3 →