Unsettling Human Rights History in Social Work Education: Seeing Intersectionality

被引:0
作者
Nadaya A. Brantley
Gabrielle Nicolini
Karen E. Kirkhart
机构
[1] Syracuse University School of Social Work,
来源
Journal of Human Rights and Social Work | 2021年 / 6卷
关键词
Intersectionality; Erasure; Human rights; Education; History;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Social workers must locate their work within the history of our profession, while also recognizing how and why particular accounts are constructed, legitimized, and disseminated. The historical context of human rights work is especially significant. This narrative has been shaped by selective attention, which advances some perspectives and erases others. Intersectionality encourages scrutiny of missing elements, calling one to explore what else was happening concurrent with the mainstream account and whose perspectives are absent from the story. This paper illustrates the value of an intersectional frame by examining three erasures from human rights history in social work: the Combahee River Collective, the Black settlement house movement, and the Compton’s Cafeteria Disturbance. The paper closes with implications for social work education in four areas: deconstructing contemporary social work narratives, investigating historical and cultural locations of our knowledge base, theoretically contextualizing intersectional contributions, and respecting intellectual contributions beyond refereed journals and other traditional formats. Intersectionality theory engages marginalized aspects of human rights history in educating professional social workers; however, it must avoid cooptation to maintain its vibrant critique.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 107
页数:9
相关论文
共 26 条
  • [1] Armstrong EA(2006)Movements and memory: the making of the Stonewall myth American Sociological Review 71 724-751
  • [2] Crage SM(2019)Why we need ‘reclaim pride’ The Gay & Lesbian Review Worldwide 26 22-25
  • [3] Baez R(1965)The white man’s guilt Ebony Magazine 20 47-48
  • [4] Baldwin J(2019)Teaching social work research through the lens of social justice, human rights, and diversity Journal of Social Work Education 55 433-448
  • [5] Bentley KJ(2008)When black + lesbian + woman ≠ black lesbian woman: the methodological challenges of qualitative and quantitative intersectionality research Sex Roles 59 312-325
  • [6] Mancini M(2012)Once you’ve blended the cake, you can’t take the parts back to the main ingredients: Black gay and bisexual men’s descriptions and experiences of intersectionality Sex Roles 68 754-767
  • [7] Jacob A(1994)The career of Birdye Henrietta Haynes, a pioneer settlement house worker Social Service Review 68 254-273
  • [8] McLeod D(2004)African American reformers’ mission: caring for our girls and women Affilia 19 257-272
  • [9] Bowleg L(1991)Radicals or realists: African American women and the settlement house spirit in New York City Afro-Americans in New York Life and History 15 7-16
  • [10] Bowleg L(1989)Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: a Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics University of Chicago Legal Forum 1989 139-167