Psychometric Properties of the Dominic Interactive in a Sample of French Canadian Sexually Abused Children

被引:0
作者
Martine Hébert
Arianne Jean-Thorn
Laetitia Mélissande Amédée
机构
[1] Université du Québec à Montréal,Département de sexologie, Canada Research Chair in Interpersonal Traumas and Resilience
[2] UQAM,Département de psychologie
来源
Journal of Child & Adolescent Trauma | 2021年 / 14卷
关键词
Dominic interactive; Validation; Psychometric properties; Child sexual abuse;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There are few computerized questionnaires assessing mental health in children. Although the psychometric properties of the Dominic Interactive have been verified for clinical and nonclinical populations, no study has specifically targeted sexually abused children. This study aimed to explore the reliability and validity of the Dominic Interactive with a sample of sexually abused children. The sample consisted of 687 children aged from 6 to 11 recruited in specialized intervention centers in Quebec. We conducted confirmatory factor analysis to assess the factorial structure of the questionnaire and assessed the internal consistency of the subscales with Cronbach alphas and McDonalds omegas. Subscales of the Dominic Interactive showed good fit with the factorial structure and met the prescribed criteria, except for Specific Phobias and Separation Anxiety subscales that showed high interitem correlations. After accounting for intercorrelation errors, all model fit indices showed good adjustment to the factorial structure and met the fit indices criteria. The different subscales of the DI were found to be significantly correlated (r ranging from .13 to .30) with their equivalent parent-reported assessments. The results extend previous findings and suggest that the Dominic Interactive is a valid tool to quickly diagnose various behavioural problems in sexually abused children.
引用
收藏
页码:223 / 231
页数:8
相关论文
共 138 条
[1]  
Achenbach TM(2011)Commentary: Definitely more than measurement error: But how should we understand and deal with informant discrepancies? Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 40 80-86
[2]  
Achenbach TM(1987)Child/adolescent behavioral and emotional problems: Implications of cross-informant correlations for situational specificity Psychological Bulletin 101 213-232
[3]  
McConaughy SH(2019)A meta-analysis of the prevalence of child sexual abuse disclosure in forensic settings Child Abuse & Neglect 93 291-304
[4]  
Howell CT(2013)Reliability, validity, and clinical use of the Dominic interactive: A DSM-based, self-report screen for school-aged children Canadian Journal of Psychiatry 58 466-475
[5]  
Azzopardi C(1998)Reliability of the Terry: A mental health cartoon-like screener for African-American children Child Psychiatry and Human Development 28 249-263
[6]  
Eirich R(2002)Mother–child relationships of children with ADHD: The role of maternal depressive symptoms and depression-related distortions Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 30 387-400
[7]  
Rash CL(2015)Cronbach’s coefficient alpha: Well-known but poorly understood Organizational Research Methods 18 207-230
[8]  
MacDonald S(2011)Diagnostic value of the Dominic interactive assessment with children exposed to intimate partner violence Psicothema 23 648-653
[9]  
Madigan S(2011)Introduction to the special section: More than measurement error: Discovering meaning behind informant discrepancies in clinical assessments of children and adolescents Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology 40 1-9
[10]  
Bergeron L(2015)The validity of the multi-informant approach to assessing child and adolescent mental health Psychological Bulletin 141 858-900