Blood pressure differences between a mercury sphygmomanometer and two automatic devices

被引:0
|
作者
Lim H.K. [1 ,2 ]
Doh I. [1 ]
Ahn B. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Korea Research Institute of Standards and Science, Seoul
[2] Korea University of Science and Technology, Seoul
关键词
Blood pressure; Cardiovascular disease; Measurement; Reference; Sphygmomanometer;
D O I
10.1007/s13534-015-0207-x
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Purpose: Blood pressure (BP) is one of the most important pieces of information to diagnose cardiovascular diseases but the measurement readings could be easily changed by various factors. If these readings are wrong, it may ultimately lead to a misdiagnosis. In addition, there is a problem when there are different devices used to read blood pressure because these devices may give different readings. Methods: Four different BP measurement devices were used, including two mercury sphygmomanometers and two automatic digital devices. Thirty-eight healthy young people (mean age = 27.1±6.1 years) stayed one night at a clinical center and the BPs were measured from their right arms on the following day. Factors such as exercise, food, and smoking that may affect the BP were controlled and prohibited. All tests were repeated three times and all devices were calibrated before the test. Absolute BP value difference between a mercury sphygmomanometer and an automatic digital device was counted for the BP difference between devices ≥ 5 mmHg and ≥ 10 mmHg of each measurement. Results: Significant inter-device BP differences were found between a mercury sphygmomanometer and two automatic devices (p<0.01) while no significant difference was found between mercury sphygmomanometers (p>0.5); all subjects showed BP difference less than 5 mmHg between two mercury sphygmomanometers while only 32% and 38% of subjects showed BP difference less than 5 mmHg for two out of three repeated tests between a mercury sphygmomanometer and an automatic device, and even 26% ~ 36% of subjects showed BP difference ≥ 10 mmHg. Conclusions: This study result stresses that it is necessary to check the reliability of automatic blood pressure devices used in the hospitals. In addition, an easier and more convenient protocol should be developed for the routine calibration of automatic devices. © 2015, Korean Society of Medical and Biological Engineering and Springer.
引用
收藏
页码:296 / 301
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers—a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Keisyanne Araujo-Moura
    Letícia Gabrielle Souza
    Gabriele Luz Mello
    Augusto César Ferreira De Moraes
    European Journal of Pediatrics, 2022, 181 : 9 - 22
  • [32] Cuffless Blood Pressure Devices
    Bradley, Corey K.
    Shimbo, Daichi
    Colburn, David Alexander
    Pugliese, Daniel N.
    Padwal, Raj
    Sia, Samuel K.
    Anstey, D. Edmund
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2022, 35 (05) : 380 - 387
  • [33] Does changing from mercury to electronic blood pressure measurement influence recorded blood pressure? An observational study
    McManus, RJ
    Mant, J
    Hull, MRP
    Hobbs, FDR
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2003, 53 (497) : 953 - 956
  • [34] Blood pressure measurement in pediatric population: comparison between automated oscillometric devices and mercury sphygmomanometers-a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Araujo-Moura, Keisyanne
    Souza, Leticia Gabrielle
    Mello, Gabriele Luz
    Ferreira De Moraes, Augusto Cesar
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2022, 181 (01) : 9 - 22
  • [35] Vascular hemodynamics and blood pressure differences between young and older women
    Brantley K. Ballenger
    Gary R. Hunter
    Gordon Fisher
    Clinical Hypertension, 27
  • [36] Gender differences in the relation between number of teeth and systolic blood pressure
    Voelzke, Henry
    Schwahn, Christian
    Doerr, Marcus
    Schwarz, Sabine
    Robinson, Daniel
    Doeren, Martina
    Rettig, Rainer
    Felix, Stephan B.
    John, Ulrich
    Kocher, Thomas
    JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2006, 24 (07) : 1257 - 1263
  • [37] Disagreement of the two oscillometric blood pressure measurement devices, Datascope Accutorr Plus and Omron HEM-705CP II, and bidirectional conversion of blood pressure values
    Adler, Carolin
    Ellert, Ute
    Neuhauser, Hannelore K.
    BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, 2014, 19 (02) : 109 - 117
  • [38] Vascular hemodynamics and blood pressure differences between young and older women
    Ballenger, Brantley K.
    Hunter, Gary R.
    Fisher, Gordon
    CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2021, 27 (01)
  • [39] Replacing Mercury Sphygmomanometers With Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometers for the National Health Survey in Children: Direct Comparisons Applying Two Types of Mercury-Free Sphygmomanometer
    Kim, Sung Hye
    Kim, Yu-Mi
    Kim, Seong Heon
    Shin, Jinho
    Lee, Eun Mi
    KOREAN CIRCULATION JOURNAL, 2024, 54 (05) : 270 - 287
  • [40] No Evidence for Long Term Blood Pressure Differences Between Eversion and Conventional Carotid Endarterectomy in Two Independent Study Cohorts
    Nolde, Janis M.
    Cheng, Suk F.
    Richards, Toby
    Schlaich, Markus P.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2022, 63 (01) : 33 - 42