Giant cell tumour of the sacrum: a suggested algorithm for treatment

被引:0
作者
Rajkumar Thangaraj
R. J. Grimer
S. R. Carter
A. J. Stirling
J. Spilsbury
D. Spooner
机构
[1] The Royal Orthopaedic Hospital Oncology Service,
来源
European Spine Journal | 2010年 / 19卷
关键词
Giant cell tumour; Sacrum; Embolisation; Radiotherapy;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
To investigate the outcome of our management of patients with giant cell tumour of the sacrum and draw lessons from this. A retrospective review of medical records and scans for all patients treated at our unit over the past 20 years with a giant cell tumour of the sacrum. Of the 517 patients treated at our unit for giant cell tumour over the past 20 years, only 9 (1.7%) had a giant cell tumour in the sacrum. Six were female, three male with a mean age of 34 (range 15–52). All, but two tumours involved the entire sacrum and there was only one purely distal to S3. The mean size was 10 cm and the most common symptom was back or buttock pain. Five had abnormal neurology at diagnosis, but only one presented with cauda equina syndrome. The first four patients were treated by curettage alone, but two patients had intraoperative cardiac arrests and although both survived all subsequent curettages were preceded by embolisation of the feeding vessels. Of the seven patients who had curettage, three developed local recurrence, but all were controlled with a combination of further embolisation, surgery or radiotherapy. One patient elected for treatment with radiotherapy and another had excision of the tumour distal to S3. All the patients are alive and only two patients have worse neurology than at presentation, one being impotent and one with stress incontinence. Three patients required spinopelvic fusion for sacral collapse. All patients are mobile and active at a follow-up between 2 and 21 years. Giant cell tumour of the sacrum can be controlled with conservative surgery rather than subtotal sacrectomy. The excision of small distal tumours is the preferred option, but for larger and more extensive tumours conservative management may well avoid morbidity whilst still controlling the tumour. Embolisation and curettage are the preferred first option with radiotherapy as a possible adjunct. Spinopelvic fusion may be needed when the sacrum collapses.
引用
收藏
页码:1189 / 1194
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Szendroi M(2004)Giant cell tumour of bone J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 86-B 5-12
[2]  
Prosser GH(2005)Does curettage without adjuvant therapy provide low recurrence rates in giant cell tumours of bone? Clin Orthop 435 211-218
[3]  
Baloch KG(2002)Giant cell tumour of long bone: a Canadian Sarcoma Group study Clin Orthop 397 248-258
[4]  
Tillman RM(2003)Radiotherapy in the management of giant cell tumour of bone Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 57 158-165
[5]  
Carter SR(2004)Giant cell tumour of the pelvis and sacrum: 17 cases and analysis of the literature Clin Orthop 423 196-207
[6]  
Grimer RJ(2002)The treatment of sacral giant cell-tumours by serial arterial embolisation J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 84-B 873-877
[7]  
Turcotte RE(2007)Serial arterial embolization for large sacral giant cell tumours: mid to long term results Spine 32 1107-1115
[8]  
Wunder JS(2002)Long term follow up of patients with giant cell tumour of the sacrum treated with selective arterial embolization Cancer 95 1317-1325
[9]  
Isler MH(1999)Megavoltage radiation therapy for axial and inoperable giant cell tumour of bone J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 81-A 1566-1573
[10]  
Caudell JJ(2006)A novel “Four rod technique” for lumbo-pelvic reconstruction: theory and technical considerations Spine 31 1395-1401