Relative embeddings: a Circassian puzzle for the syntax/semantics interface

被引:0
作者
Ivano Caponigro
Maria Polinsky
机构
[1] University of California San Diego,Department of Linguistics
[2] Harvard University,Department of Linguistics
来源
Natural Language & Linguistic Theory | 2011年 / 29卷
关键词
Adyghe (Circassian); Relative clauses; Headless relatives; Embedded clauses; Declarative clauses; Interrogative clauses; Concealed questions; Polarity operators;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
This paper documents and analyzes the pattern used in the Northwest Caucasian language Adyghe (Circassian) to express what the following five different constructions convey in other languages: headed and headless relative clauses, embedded declaratives, embedded polar interrogatives, and embedded constituent interrogatives. We argue that Adyghe encodes the meanings of all these embedded structures by means of the same syntactic construction, a relative clause. This pervasive use of relative clauses is possible due to mechanisms that are independently attested not just in Adyghe but also in more familiar languages like English. These mechanisms include concealed questions, polarity operators, and nominals such as fact and question that can connect propositional attitude verbs or interrogative verbs with embedded clauses. We suggest that this extensive use of relative clauses in Adyghe is triggered by the absence of non-relative complementizer. We further show that this use is facilitated by their morphological visibility: a relativizer realized as a prefix on the verb, verbal affixation, a rich system of applicative heads hosting indirect arguments, and the availability of a case marker suffixed to headless relatives. We conclude by discussing the implications of the Adyghe system for the general design of embedding and subordination in natural language.
引用
收藏
页码:71 / 122
页数:51
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] Aldridge Edith(2008)Generative approaches to syntactic ergativity Language and Linguistics Compass: Syntax and Morphology 2 966-995
  • [2] Bresnan Joan(1970)On complementizers: toward a syntactic theory of complement types Foundations of Language 6 297-321
  • [3] Broschart Jürgen(1997)Why Tongan does it differently: categorial distinctions in a language without nouns and verbs Linguistic Typology 1 123-165
  • [4] Caponigro Ivano(2009)The nominal nature of Linguistic Inquiry 40 155-164
  • [5] Pearl Lisa(1998), Natural Language Semantics 6 339-405
  • [6] Chierchia Gennaro(2004), and Linguistics and Philosophy 27 393-450
  • [7] Dayal Veneeta(2000): evidence from free relatives Studia Linguistica 54 41-89
  • [8] den Dikken Marcel(2006)Reference to kinds across languages Journal of the International Phonetic Association 36 159-186
  • [9] Meinunger Andre(1997)Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms Linguistic Inquiry 28 373-422
  • [10] Wilder Chris(2004)Pseudoclefts and ellipsis Natural Language Semantics 12 319-343