Development of Transdisciplinarity Among Students Placed with a Sustainability for Health Research Project

被引:0
作者
Fadya Orozco
Donald C. Cole
机构
[1] Universidade Federal da Bahia,Instituto de Saúde Coletiva
[2] University of Toronto,Dalla Lana School of Public Health
[3] International Potato Center,Agriculture and Health Division
来源
EcoHealth | 2008年 / 5卷
关键词
transdisciplinary learning; developing countries; sustainability; higher education; qualitative methods; action research;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Transdisciplinary education on sustainability for health has been primarily developed in high-income countries, yet the need in countries with limited research and human resource investments remains urgent. Little empiric documentation of the facilitators and barriers to transdisciplinary learning in such countries has been described. We assessed transdisciplinary learning among students of different disciplines collaborating with an Ecuadorian sustainability for health research project. Six undergraduate students from four different disciplinary backgrounds were incorporated through work–study agreements with provincial university academic supervisors. Learning was fostered and monitored through participant observations by a field supervisor. Students’ learning was evaluated through subsequent in-depth interviews and visualization methods. Academic supervisor key informant and co-investigator observations aided triangulation. Qualitative data were analyzed using indicators of transdisciplinary thinking. Principal factors facilitating transdisciplinary learning were interaction with social actors, the integration of work with other disciplines, the use of alternative research techniques and methods, and the constant support of the field supervisor. Inhibiting factors included the existence of rigid academic rules, lack of training of the academic supervisors in diverse research methods, and social pressures to implement unidisciplinary foci. At the end of their link with the project, students had developed both cognitive outcomes and attitudinal values relevant to sustainable development for health. In countries with limited investments in research and human resources development, transdisciplinary approaches with social actors and engaged researchers can sensitize new professionals training in traditional academic contexts to the ecological–social–health problems faced by poor majorities and encourage their subsequent work on sustainability for human health.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 503
页数:12
相关论文
共 78 条
[1]  
Adomsset M(2007)Transferability of approaches to sustainable development at universities as a challenge International Journal of Sustainability and Higher Education 8 385-402
[2]  
Godemann J(2004)Evolution of transdisciplinarity and ecosystem health at the University of Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia EcoHealth 1 23-29
[3]  
Michelsen G(2005)Transdisciplinaridade e o paradigma pós-disciplinar na saúde Saúde e Sociedade 14 30-50
[4]  
Albrecht G(2005)Congressos Internacionais sobre transdisciplinaridade: reflexções sobre emergencias e convergencias de ideias e ideais na direção de uma nova ciencia moderna Saúde e Sociedade 14 9-29
[5]  
Higginbotham N(2005)Transdisciplinarity in sustainability research: diffusion conditions of an institutional innovation International Journal of Sustainable Development and World Ecology 12 1-12
[6]  
Cashman P(2007)Towards a proposal of estimation of the “innovating attitude” in the society Espacios 28 41-56
[7]  
Flint K(2006)Multidisciplinarity, interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in health research, services, education and policy: 1. Definitions, objectives and evidence of effectiveness Clinical and Investigative Medicine 29 351-363
[8]  
Almeida N(2006)Canada’s International Development Research Centre’s Eco-Health projects with Latin Americans: origins, development and challenges Canadian Journal of Public Health 97 I8-I14
[9]  
Alvarenga T(2000)Determining validity in qualitative inquiry Theory into Practice 39 124-131
[10]  
Sommerman A(2006)Work based learning; discipline, field or discursive space or what? Research in Post-Compulsory Education 11 341-350