Who opposes government arts funding?

被引:0
作者
Arthur C. Brooks
机构
[1] Georgia State University,Public Administration and Economics
来源
Public Choice | 2001年 / 108卷
关键词
Public Finance; General Social Survey; Income Class; Strong Opposition; National Endowment;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
While the reasons for the controversy overpublic arts funding are well-understood,less clear is the set of variables thatassociates with strong opposition orsupport for arts subsidies. Using data fromthe General Social Survey, this paperbuilds a model to predict opposition basedon ideological, economic, and demographiccharacteristics. The most importantpredictors of opposition are found to bepolitical views, gender, income, privatedonations to the arts, and region ofresidence. The results in this papersuggest that the benefits of public artsfunding accrue primarily to those in thehighest income class, and that supportvaries somewhat according to the level ofgovernment providing the funding.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 367
页数:12
相关论文
共 10 条
  • [1] Brooks A.C.(1997)Toward a demand-side cure for cost disease in the performing arts Journal of Economic Issues 31 197-207
  • [2] DiMaggio P.(1999)Surveys of public attitudes toward the arts: What surveys tell us about the arts, political trials-and how they might tell us even more Arts Education Policy Review 100 32-37
  • [3] Pettit B.(1984)Changing public attitudes toward public funding of the arts Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 471 45-56
  • [4] Hart K.C.(1984)American conservatism and government funding of the social sciences and the arts Sociological Inquiry 54 171-187
  • [5] Himmelstein J.L.(1991)John R. Commons and the progressive context Midwest Quarterly 32 324-337
  • [6] Zald M.(1990)The threshold of public attention Public Opinion Quarterly 54 159-176
  • [7] Horne R.(1994)The production and consumption of the arts: A view of cultural economics Journal of Economic Literature 32 1-29
  • [8] Neuman W.R.(1991)Information, values and opinion American Political Science Review 85 1215-1238
  • [9] Throsby C.D.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined
  • [10] Zaller J.R.(undefined)undefined undefined undefined undefined-undefined