Evaluation of three PCR-based diagnostic assays for detecting mixed Plasmodium infection

被引:48
作者
Mixson-Hayden T. [1 ,2 ]
Lucchi N.W. [1 ,2 ]
Udhayakumar V. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Malaria Branch, Division of Parasitic Diseases, National Center for Zoonotic Vector-Borne and Enteric Diseases, Atlanta, GA
[2] Atlanta Research and Education Foundation, Decatur, GA
关键词
Malaria; Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay; Mixed Infection; Nest Polymerase Chain Reaction; Malaria Diagnosis;
D O I
10.1186/1756-0500-3-88
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Background. One of the most commonly used molecular test for malaria diagnosis is the polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based amplification of the 18S ribosomal DNA (rDNA) gene. Published diagnostic assays based on the 18S gene include the "gold standard" nested assay, semi-nested multiplex assay, and one tube multiplex assay. To our knowledge, no one has reported whether the two multiplex methods are better at detecting mixed Plasmodium infections compared to the nested assay using known quantities of DNA in experimentally mixed cocktails. Findings. Here we evaluated three PCR assays (nested, semi-nested multiplex, and one-tube multiplex) for the simultaneous detection of human malaria parasites using experimentally mixed cocktails of known quantities of laboratory derived DNA. All three assays detected individual species with high sensitivity and specificity when DNA was from any one single species; however, experimentally mixed DNA cocktails with all four species present were correctly identified most consistently with the nested method. The other two methods failed to consistently identify all four species correctly, especially at lower concentrations of DNA -subclinical levels of malaria (DNA equivalent to or less than 10 parasites per microliter). Conclusions. The nested PCR method remains the method of choice for the detection of mixed malaria infections and especially of sub-clinical infections. Further optimization and/or new molecular gene targets may improve the success rate of detecting multiple parasite species simultaneously using traditional PCR assays. © 2010 Udhayakumar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Snow R.W., Guerra C.A., Noor A.M., Myint H.Y., Hay S.I., The global distribution of clinical episodes of Plasmodium falciparum malaria, Nature, 434, 7030, pp. 214-217, (2005)
[2]  
The World Malaria Report, (2008)
[3]  
Hamer D.H., Singh M.P., Wylie B.J., Yeboah-Antwi K., Tuchman J., Desai M., Udhayakumar V., Gupta P., Brooks M.I., Shukla M.M., Et al., Burden of malaria in pregnancy in Jharkhand State, India, Malaria Journal, 8, (2009)
[4]  
Rasheed A., Saeed S., Khan S.A., Clinical and laboratory findings in acute malaria caused by various plasmodium species, Journal of the Pakistani Medical Association, 59, pp. 220-223, (2009)
[5]  
Mayxay M., Pukrittayakamee S., Newton P.N., White N.J., Mixed-species malaria infections in humans, Trends in Parasitology, 20, 5, pp. 233-240, (2004)
[6]  
Zimmerman P.A., Mehlotra R.K., Kasehagen L.J., Kazura J.W., Why do we need to know more about mixed Plasmodium species infections in humans?, Trends in Parasitology, 20, pp. 440-447, (2004)
[7]  
Bronzan R.N., McMorrow M.L., Kachur S.P., Diagnosis of malaria: Challenges for clinicians in endemic and non-endemic regions, Molecular Diagnosis and Therapy, 12, pp. 299-306, (2008)
[8]  
Hanscheid T., Current strategies to avoid misdiagnosis of malaria, Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 9, 6, pp. 497-504, (2003)
[9]  
Payne D., Use and limitations of light microscopy for diagnosing malaria at the primary health care level, Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 66, 5, pp. 621-626, (1988)
[10]  
Milne L.M., Kyi M.S., Chiodini P.L., Warhurst D.C., Accuracy of routine laboratory diagnosis of malaria in the United Kingdom, Journal of Clinical Pathology, 47, pp. 740-742, (1994)