First validation of myocardial flow reserve assessed by dynamic 99mTc-sestamibi CZT-SPECT camera: head to head comparison with 15O-water PET and fractional flow reserve in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. The WATERDAY study

[1] Ben-Haim S(2013)Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: a feasibility study J Nucl Med 54 873-879

[2] Murthy VL(2015)SPECT myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with multivessel coronary disease: correlation with angiographic findings and invasive fractional flow reserve measurements J Nucl Med 56 1712-1727

[3] Breault C(2016)Absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve assessed by gated SPECT with cadmium–zinc–telluride detectors using 99mTc-Tetrofosmin: head-to-head comparison with 13N-ammonia PET J Nucl Med 57 1887-1892

[4] Allie R(1984)Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O Circulation 70 724-733

[5] Sitek A(1993)Direct comparison of [13N]ammonia and [15O]water estimates of perfusion with quantification of regional myocardial blood flow by microspheres Circulation 87 512-525

[6] Roth N(1985)Quantitative measurement of myocardial blood flow with oxygen-15 water and positron computed tomography: an assessment of potential and problems J Nucl Med 26 616-625

[7] Ben Bouallègue F(2009)Myocardial perfusion quantitation with 15O-labelled water PET: high reproducibility of the new cardiac analysis software (Carimas) Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 1594-1502

[8] Roubille F(2000)Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial blood flow using oxygen-15-labelled water and positron emission tomography: a multicentre evaluation in Japan Eur J Nucl Med 27 192-201

[9] Lattuca B(2009)Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 213-224

[10] Cung TT(2012)Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease N Engl J Med 367 991-1001

[1] Ben-Haim S(2013)Quantification of myocardial perfusion reserve using dynamic SPECT imaging in humans: a feasibility study J Nucl Med 54 873-879

[2] Murthy VL(2015)SPECT myocardial perfusion reserve in patients with multivessel coronary disease: correlation with angiographic findings and invasive fractional flow reserve measurements J Nucl Med 56 1712-1727

[3] Breault C(2016)Absolute myocardial blood flow and flow reserve assessed by gated SPECT with cadmium–zinc–telluride detectors using 99mTc-Tetrofosmin: head-to-head comparison with 13N-ammonia PET J Nucl Med 57 1887-1892

[4] Allie R(1984)Quantification of regional myocardial blood flow in vivo with H215O Circulation 70 724-733

[5] Sitek A(1993)Direct comparison of [13N]ammonia and [15O]water estimates of perfusion with quantification of regional myocardial blood flow by microspheres Circulation 87 512-525

[6] Roth N(1985)Quantitative measurement of myocardial blood flow with oxygen-15 water and positron computed tomography: an assessment of potential and problems J Nucl Med 26 616-625

[7] Ben Bouallègue F(2009)Myocardial perfusion quantitation with 15O-labelled water PET: high reproducibility of the new cardiac analysis software (Carimas) Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 36 1594-1502

[8] Roubille F(2000)Quantitative assessment of regional myocardial blood flow using oxygen-15-labelled water and positron emission tomography: a multicentre evaluation in Japan Eur J Nucl Med 27 192-201

[9] Lattuca B(2009)Fractional flow reserve versus angiography for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention N Engl J Med 360 213-224

[10] Cung TT(2012)Fractional flow reserve-guided PCI versus medical therapy in stable coronary disease N Engl J Med 367 991-1001