A calibration-free model for laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using non-gated detectors

被引:0
作者
Zongyu Hou
Weilun Gu
Tianqi Li
Zhe Wang
Liang Li
Xiang Yu
Yecai Zhang
Zijun Liu
机构
[1] Tsinghua University,State Key Lab of Power System, Department of Energy and Power Engineering, International Joint Laboratory on Low Carbon Clean Energy Innovation
[2] Tsinghua University,Shanxi Research Institute for Clean Energy
[3] Beijing Research Institute of Chemical Engineering and Metallurgy,undefined
[4] China National Uranium Corporation,undefined
[5] Guoneng Shenwan Energy Co.,undefined
[6] Ltd,undefined
[7] Jinneng Holding Tashan Power Generation Co.,undefined
[8] Ltd,undefined
来源
Frontiers of Physics | 2022年 / 17卷
关键词
laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy; calibration-free; non-gated detector; self-absorption correction;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Calibration-free (CF) laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is normally only applicable for gated detectors due to its dependence on the assumption of a steady-state plasma. However, most currently available LIBS systems are equipped with non-gated detectors such as charge-coupled device (CCD), which degrades the accuracy of CF method. In this paper, the reason for the less satisfactory quantification performance of CF for LIBS with non-gated detectors was clarified and a time-integration calibration-free (TICF) model was proposed for applications with non-gated detectors. It was based on an assumed temporal profile of plasma properties, including temperature and electron density, obtained from another pre-experiment. The line intensity at different time during the signal collection time window was estimated with self-absorption correction according to the temporal profile of the plasma properties. The proposed model was validated on titanium alloys and compared with traditional CF. The accuracy of elemental concentration measurement was improved significantly: the average relative error of aluminum and vanadium decreased from 6.07% and 22.34% to 2.01% and 1.92%, respectively. The quantification results showed that TICF method was able to extend the applicability of CF to LIBS with non-gated detectors.
引用
收藏
相关论文
共 334 条
[1]  
Andrade D F(2021)Current trends in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: A tutorial review Appl. Spectrosc. Rev. 56 98-undefined
[2]  
Pereira-Filho E R(2021)Recent advances in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy quantification: From fundamental understanding to data processing Trends Analyt. Chem. 143 116385-undefined
[3]  
Amarasiriwardena D(2021)Development in the application of laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in recent years: A review Front. Phys. 16 22500-undefined
[4]  
Wang Z(2014)Laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy in China Front. Phys. 9 419-undefined
[5]  
Afgan M S(2019)Sensitive determination of silicon contents in low-alloy steels using micro laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy assisted with laser-induced fluorescence Talanta 194 697-undefined
[6]  
Gu W(2019)Coal analysis by laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy: A tutorial review J. Anal. At. Spectrom. 34 1047-undefined
[7]  
Song Y(2020)Chlorine and sulfur determination in water using indirect laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy Talanta 214 120849-undefined
[8]  
Wang Y(2021)Determination of fluorine content in rocks using laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy assisted with radical synthesis Talanta 234 122712-undefined
[9]  
Hou Z(2019)Accuracy improvement of quantitative analysis for major elements in laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy using single-sample calibration Anal. Chim. Acta 1064 11-undefined
[10]  
Song W(2022)Fast measurement of coking properties of coal using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy Spectrochim. Acta B At. Spectrosc. 191 106406-undefined