Experimental study on the enhancement of particle removal efficiency in spray tower scrubber using electrospray

被引:1
作者
Kim H.-G. [1 ]
Kim H.-J. [1 ]
Lee M.-H. [2 ]
Kim J.-H. [1 ]
机构
[1] Department of Environmental Engineering, Hanseo University
[2] Thermochemical Energy System R and BD Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology
关键词
Collection efficiency; Electrospray; Liquid-gas flow rate; Spray tower scrubber;
D O I
10.5572/ajae.2014.8.2.089
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
There have been a lot of efforts to keep permissible emission standards and to reduce the amount of emitted air pollutants. There are several air pollution control equipments, however, wet scrubber is used to remove particulate matters and gaseous pollutants simultaneously, even if it has low collection efficiency in the particle size less than 5.0 μm. To overcome this problem, we introduced a spray tower scrubber with an electrospray system which a high voltage was indirectly applied. We found that collection efficiency of fine particles in the electrospray system was improved by increasing electrical field strength and the ratio of liquid-gas flow rate (from 41% to 84% for 0.3 μm particles). In addition, a number of small droplets generated from an electrospray system led high collection efficiency, resulting from electrostatic attraction between droplets and particles and higher collision frequency. Therefore, we can conclude that the introduction of an electrospray system is quite effective to increase the particle removal efficiency of a spray tower scrubber.
引用
收藏
页码:89 / 95
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
Bailey A.G., Electrostatic spraying of liquids., pp. 60-75, (1998)
[2]  
Carotenuto C., Natale F.D., Lancia A., Wet electrostatic scrubbers for the abatement of submicronic particulate, Chemical Engineering Journal, 165, pp. 35-45, (2010)
[3]  
Chow J.C., Watson J.G., Lowenthal D.H., Chen L.-W.A., Motallebi N., Black and organic carbon emission inventories: Review and Application to California, Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association, 60, pp. 497-507, (2010)
[4]  
Cooper C.D., Alley F.C., Air pollution control
[5]  
A design approach., pp. 209-217, (2002)
[6]  
Ehrlich C., Noll G., Kalkoff W.-D., Baumbach G., Dreiseidler A., PM10, PM2.5 and PM1.0-Emissions from industrial plants-Results from measurement programmes in Germany, Atmospheric Environment, 41, pp. 6236-6254, (2007)
[7]  
Ganan-Calvo A.M., Davila J., Barrero A., Current Droplet size in the Electrospraying of Liquids. Scaling laws., Journal of Aerosol Science, 28, 2, pp. 249-275, (1997)
[8]  
Hartman R.P.A., Brunner D.J., Camelot D.M.A., Marijnissen J.C., Scarlett B., Jet break-up in electrohydrodynamic atomization in cone jet mode., Journal of Aerosol Science, 31, 1, pp. 65-95, (2000)
[9]  
Hinds W.C., Aerosol Technology., pp. 304-314, (1999)
[10]  
Hobbs P.V., Aerosol-Cloud-Climate Interaction., pp. 75-93, (1993)