A simplified method to determine left atrial volume and transport function using multi-slice computed tomography in patients with atrial fibrillation: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography

被引:0
作者
Seung Yong Shin
Hwan Seok Yong
Jin Oh Na
Cheol Ung Choi
Seong Hwan Kim
Jin Won Kim
Eung Ju Kim
Seung-Woon Rha
Chang Gyu Park
Hong Seog Seo
Dong Joo Oh
Young-Hoon Kim
Hong Euy Lim
机构
[1] Korea University Guro Hospital,Cardiovascular Center
[2] Korea University Guro Hospital,Department of Radiology
[3] Korea University Ansan Hospital,Division of Cardiology
来源
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging | 2012年 / 28卷
关键词
Atrial fibrillation; Computed tomography; Echocardiography; Function; Left atrium;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Although left atrial volumes (LAVs) and transport function can be accurately measured by multi-slice computed tomography (MSCT) during sinus rhythm, limited data are available for in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). The aims of our study were to compare LAVs and function assessed by MSCT and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) during AF, and to validate a simplified method to determine LAVs and functions using MSCT. A total of 150 consecutive AF patients who were scheduled to undergo catheter ablation were enrolled in this study. All subjects underwent MSCT and TTE on the same day. LAVs were measured by MSCT at every 10% of the R–R interval (10-phase analysis). LA transport function was assessed by measuring changes in LAVs. LAVs and functions were also assessed by TTE using a modified Simpson’s method and an area-length method. Fifty patients were in sinus rhythm (SR) and 100 were in AF during their examinations. Although TTE underestimated the maximal LAV (LAVmax, by 38.3%) and overestimated the total LA emptying fraction (LAEFtotal, by 61.1%) compared with MSCT, there were excellent correlations between TTE and MSCT. LAVmax and the minimal LAV (LAVmin) based on MSCT were determined at relatively constant cardiac phases during AF as well as SR (LAVmax; 40%, LAVmin; 100% of R–R interval, fixed-phase analysis). LAVs and LAEFtotal assessed by 10-phase analysis showed good correlations with those assessed by fixed-phase analysis (P < 0.001). LAVs and function assessed by MSCT correlated well with LAVs and functions assessed by TTE, irrespective of the underlying rhythm. Our results indicate that in the context of MSCT, fixed-phase analysis is a simple and reliable method to determine LAVs and function in patients with AF.
引用
收藏
页码:1205 / 1216
页数:11
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Abhayaratna WP(2006)Left atrial size: physiologic determinants and clinical applications J Am Coll Cardiol 47 2357-2363
  • [2] Seward JB(2005)Left atrial volume predicts cardiovascular events in patients originally diagnosed with lone atrial fibrillation: three-decade follow-up Eur Heart J 26 2556-2561
  • [3] Appleton CP(2003)Left atrial volume as an index of left atrial size: a population-based study J Am Coll Cardiol 41 1036-1043
  • [4] Osranek M(2009)Relation of left atrial volume from three-dimensional computed tomography to atrial fibrillation recurrence following ablation Am J Cardiol 103 989-993
  • [5] Bursi F(1999)Best method in clinical practice and in research studies to determine left atrial size Am J Cardiol 84 829-832
  • [6] Bailey KR(2006)Prediction of cardiovascular outcomes with left atrial size: is volume superior to area or diameter? J Am Coll Cardiol 47 1018-1023
  • [7] Pritchett AM(2001)A clinical appraisal of left atrial function Eur Heart J 22 22-36
  • [8] Jacobsen SJ(2011)The atria: from morphology to function J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 22 223-235
  • [9] Mahoney DW(2010)Comparison of the accuracy of multidetector computed tomography versus two-dimensional echocardiography to measure left atrial volume Am J Cardiol 106 104-109
  • [10] Helms AS(2005)Effect of left atrial circumferential ablation for atrial fibrillation on left atrial transport function Heart Rhythm 2 923-928