Heterophily in social groups formation: a social network analysis

被引:1
作者
Barranco O. [1 ]
Lozares C. [1 ]
Muntanyola-Saura D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Centre d’Estudis Sociològics sobre la Vida Quotidiana i el Treball (QUIT) – Institut d’Estudis del Treball (IET), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona
关键词
Group formation; Heterophily; Personal networks; Social network analysis;
D O I
10.1007/s11135-018-0777-7
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
Research on heterophily as a relational phenomenon is mostly limited to specific professional contexts which do not include knowledge about status or value heterophily as a possible group-generating principle. This article tries to close this gap by proposing and applying a new method of data analysis to investigate this possible role of heterophily. We apply social network analysis to personal network data. As a preliminary, we introduce a conceptual distinction between two types of heterophily, what we call intra-category heterophily and inter-category heterophily, and we validate the adjusted residuals of contingency tables to measure these two types of heterophily. Then, we reconstruct the relational space of these heterophilous relations among categories or attributes defined by socio-demographic and status characteristics. Finally, we group by faction algorithm the categories or attributes that maintain denser heterophilous relationships with each other than with the rest. The methodology proves to be valid and useful for achieving the desired analytical objective, revealing that status-heterophilous relationships can be considered as guiding principles, or mechanisms, for generating groups of social categories. © 2018, Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature.
引用
收藏
页码:599 / 619
页数:20
相关论文
共 67 条
  • [1] Alos R., Desempleo y empleo durante la crisis, Diagnóstico socioeconómico Sobre Las políticas De Empleo En España, 2012–2014, (2015)
  • [2] Arrow H., McGrath J.E., Berdahl J.L., Small Groups as Complex Systems: Formation, Coordination, Development, and Adaptation, (2000)
  • [3] Backstrom L., Huttenlocher D., Kleinberg J., Xiangyang L., Group formation in large social networks: Membership, growth, and evolution, Proceedings of 12Th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 44-54, (2006)
  • [4] Beaud S., Pialoux M., Retour sur la condition ouvrière, (1999)
  • [5] Blau P.M., A macrosociological theory of social structure, Am. J. Sociol., 83, 1, pp. 26-54, (1977)
  • [6] Bolibar M., Marti J., Verd J.M., Just a question of time? The composition and evolution of immigrants’ personal networks in Catalonia, Int. Sociol., 30, 6, pp. 579-598, (2015)
  • [7] Bottero W., Social inequality and interaction, Sociol. Compass, 1, 2, pp. 814-831, (2007)
  • [8] Bourdieu P., Social space and the genesis of groups, Theor. Soc., 14, pp. 723-744, (1985)
  • [9] Bourdieu P., What makes a social class? On the theorethical and practical existence of groups, BJS, 32, pp. 1-17, (1987)
  • [10] Burt R.S., The gender of social capital, Ration. Soc., 10, pp. 5-47, (1998)