Water use and yield responses of cotton to alternate partial root-zone drip irrigation in the arid area of north-west China

被引:1
作者
Taisheng Du
Shaozhong Kang
Jianhua Zhang
Fusheng Li
机构
[1] China Agricultural University,Center for Agricultural Water Research in China
[2] Hong Kong Baptist University,Department of Biology
[3] Guangxi University,Agricultural College
来源
Irrigation Science | 2008年 / 26卷
关键词
Soil Water Content; Drip Irrigation; Drip Line; Irrigation Amount; Plastic Mulch;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
A field experiment was carried out over 2 years to investigate the effect of partial root-zone irrigation applied using drip irrigation on the water use and yield of cotton (Gossypiumhirsutum) in oasis fields of arid north-west China. Two irrigation treatments, i.e., conventional drip irrigation (CDI, both sides of plant row watered) or alternate drip irrigation (ADI, both sides of plant row alternatively watered) were applied under plastic mulch. Three irrigation levels (i.e., 15, 22.5, 30 mm during 2004 and 12, 18, 24 mm during 2005) were applied at each irrigation. Monitoring of soil water contents in the ADI treatment indicated a change in root-zone uptake in response to the irrigation method, although there existed some lateral soil water movement from the wetted side to the dry side after each watering. Stomatal conductance in ADI was lower than that of CDI when compared at the same irrigation level. Reduced stomatal conductance and water loss resulted in higher water use efficiency (WUE) in the ADI treatment. About 31-33% less total irrigation water was applied using the ADI method when compared to that of the CDI treatment with a similar seed cotton yield. ADI also yielded 11% more pre-frost seed cotton than CDI in 2005, indicating a better lint quality and higher price. These results suggest that ADI should be a useful water-saving irrigation method in arid oasis fields where cotton production is heavily dependent on irrigation and water resources are scarce.
引用
收藏
页码:147 / 159
页数:12
相关论文
共 138 条
  • [1] Blackman PG(1985)Root to shoot communication in maize plants of the effects of soil drying J Exp Bot 36 39-48
  • [2] Davies WJ(2005)Physiological tools for irrigation scheduling in grapevine ( Agric Ecosyst Environ 106 159-170
  • [3] Cifre J(2005) L.). An open gate to improve water-use efficiency? Agric Ecosyst Environ 106 261-274
  • [4] Bota J(2000)Control of stomatal aperture and carbon uptake by deficit irrigation in two grapevine cultivars J Exp Bot 51 1617-1626
  • [5] Escalona JM(1998)Regulation of leaf and fruit growth in plants growing in drying soil: exploitation of the plants’ chemical signaling system and hydraulic architecture to increase the efficiency of water use in agriculture Aust J Grape Wine Res 4 140-148
  • [6] Medrano H(2000)Factors influencing grapevine vigour and the potential for control with partial rootzone drying Aust Grapegrow Winemak 438a 35-39
  • [7] Flexas J(2006)Partial rootzone drying—an update Agric Water Manag 84 41-52
  • [8] Claudia R(2004)Yield and physiological response of cotton to partial root-zone irrigation in the oasis field of northwest China J Hydraul Eng 35 120-127
  • [9] Maroco JP(1990)Effects of root-divided alternative irrigation on soil moisture distribution and root-trunk sap flow dynamics of peach trees J Exp Bot 41 1535-1540
  • [10] dos Santos TP(2005)A positive root-sourced signal as an indicator of soil drying in apple, Chin J Appl Ecol 16 375-378