Assessment of the Relative Largest Earthquake Hazard Level in the NW Himalaya and its Adjacent Region

被引:0
作者
Theodoros M. Tsapanos
R. B. S. Yadav
Efthalia M. Olasoglou
Mayshree Singh
机构
[1] School of Geology,Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
[2] Geophysical Lab,Department of Geophysics
[3] Kurukshetra University,School of Engineering
[4] University of KwaZulu-Natal,undefined
来源
Acta Geophysica | 2016年 / 64卷
关键词
index; GIII; value; return period; NW Himalaya;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
学科分类号
摘要
In the present study, the level of the largest earthquake hazard is assessed in 28 seismic zones of the NW Himalaya and its vicinity, which is a highly seismically active region of the world. Gumbel’s third asymptotic distribution (hereafter as GIII) is adopted for the evaluation of the largest earthquake magnitudes in these seismic zones. Instead of taking in account any type of Mmax, in the present study we consider the ω value which is the largest earthquake magnitude that a region can experience according to the GIII statistics. A function of the form Θ(ω, RP6.0) is providing in this way a relatively largest earthquake hazard scale defined by the letter K (K index). The return periods for the ω values (earthquake magnitudes) 6 or larger (RP6.0) are also calculated. According to this index, the investigated seismic zones are classified into five groups and it is shown that seismic zones 3 (Quetta of Pakistan), 11 (Hindukush), 15 (northern Pamirs), and 23 (Kangra, Himachal Pradesh of India) correspond to a “very high” K index which is 6.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 378
页数:16
相关论文
共 117 条
  • [1] Arora BR(2012)Structural control on along-strike variation in the seismicity of the northwest Himalaya J. Asian Earth Sci 57 15-24
  • [2] Gahalaut VK(1975)Seismicity of Tanzania region Tectonophysics 27 353-379
  • [3] Kumar N(1983)Earthquake frequency and energy in Greece Tectonophysics 95 233-252
  • [4] Båth M(2008)Regional variation of the ω-upper bound magnitude of GIII distribution in and around Turkey: tectonic implications for earthquake hazards Pure Appl. Geophys. 165 1367-1390
  • [5] Båth M(1999)A probabilistic seismic hazard map of India and adjoining regions Ann. Geophys. 42 1153-1164
  • [6] Bayrak Y(1980)The observation of a universal shape regularity in earthquake frequency-magnitude distributions Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 70 349-362
  • [7] Öztürk S(1993)Geological and geophysical evidence of deep subduction of continental crust beneath the Pamir Geol. Soc. Am., Sp. Paper 281 1-76
  • [8] Çinar H(1977)The application of extreme value statistics to seismic hazard assessment in the European area Proc. Symp. Analysis of Seismicity and on Seismic Risk, 17–22 October 1977, Liblice, Czech Republic 1722 323-334
  • [9] Koravos GCh(1979)Seismic risk in southern Europe through to India examined using Gumbel’s third distribution of extreme values Geophys. J. Int. 59 249-280
  • [10] Tsapanos TM(1980)Microearthquake seismicity and fault plane solutions in the Hindu Kush Region and their tectonic implications J. Geophys. Res. 85 1365-1387